BACKGROUND: Numerous reports have demonstrated an association between autonomic tone and atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein (PV) denervation during catheter ablation of AF has been shown to significantly reduce recurrence of AF. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of high-frequency stimulation at mapping cardiac ganglionated plexuses in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. METHODS: Fourteen patients with a history of symptomatic AF underwent a single transseptal approach and electroanatomic mapping of the left atrium, right atrium, and coronary sinus. Using high-frequency stimulation with patients under general anesthesia (20-50 Hz, 5-15 V, pulse width 10 ms), mapping of ganglionated plexuses was performed. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation was performed during AF guided by complex fractionated atrial electrograms. Lesions were mostly delivered circumferentially in the antral area of the PVs, predominantly over and adjacent to regions of ganglionated plexuses. RESULTS: There was a mean of 4 +/- 1 (range 2-6) ganglionated plexuses per patient, and a mean total of 3 +/- 1 RF applications were delivered over positive vagal sites. Although a vagal response occurred infrequently during ablation (0.9%), postablation high-frequency stimulation failed to provoke a vagal response in 30 (88%) of 34 previously positive vagal sites that underwent ablation. CONCLUSION: Ganglionated plexuses can be precisely mapped using high-frequency stimulation and are located predominantly in the path of lesions delivered during ablation of AF. Objective documentation of modification of autonomic tone can be documented in the majority of patients. Future studies are required to determine the specific role of mapping and targeting of ganglionated plexuses in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF.
BACKGROUND: Numerous reports have demonstrated an association between autonomic tone and atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein (PV) denervation during catheter ablation of AF has been shown to significantly reduce recurrence of AF. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of high-frequency stimulation at mapping cardiac ganglionated plexuses in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. METHODS: Fourteen patients with a history of symptomatic AF underwent a single transseptal approach and electroanatomic mapping of the left atrium, right atrium, and coronary sinus. Using high-frequency stimulation with patients under general anesthesia (20-50 Hz, 5-15 V, pulse width 10 ms), mapping of ganglionated plexuses was performed. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation was performed during AF guided by complex fractionated atrial electrograms. Lesions were mostly delivered circumferentially in the antral area of the PVs, predominantly over and adjacent to regions of ganglionated plexuses. RESULTS: There was a mean of 4 +/- 1 (range 2-6) ganglionated plexuses per patient, and a mean total of 3 +/- 1 RF applications were delivered over positive vagal sites. Although a vagal response occurred infrequently during ablation (0.9%), postablation high-frequency stimulation failed to provoke a vagal response in 30 (88%) of 34 previously positive vagal sites that underwent ablation. CONCLUSION: Ganglionated plexuses can be precisely mapped using high-frequency stimulation and are located predominantly in the path of lesions delivered during ablation of AF. Objective documentation of modification of autonomic tone can be documented in the majority of patients. Future studies are required to determine the specific role of mapping and targeting of ganglionated plexuses in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF.
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Mark J Shen; Eue-Keun Choi; Alex Y Tan; Shien-Fong Lin; Michael C Fishbein; Lan S Chen; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; José Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 6.343