Sabine Pestel1, Hans-Juergen Martin, Gerd-Michael Maier, Brian Guth. 1. Group General Pharmacology, Drug Discovery Support, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, D-88397 Biberach an der Riss, Germany. S.Pestel@bc.boehringer-ingelheim.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Solubility is often a limiting factor when testing new compounds in animal experiments. Various solubilizing agents may be used, but each have their own pharmacological effects. We investigated the effects of selected vehicles having different chemical characteristics on gastrointestinal, renal, and liver function. METHODS: Rats were treated orally, intravenously or intraperitoneally and gastric emptying, intestinal transit, renal, and liver function were investigated. RESULTS: Gastrointestinal motility was influenced by hydroxyethylcellulose, hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HPbetaCD), HPgammaCD, DMSO, polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400), fat emulsion, and the corresponding emulsifier. Liver function was affected by HPbetaCD, HPgammaCD, DMSO, PEG 400, Polysorbate 80, Cremophor RH 40, and fat emulsion. An increase in liver enzymes was observed after PEG 400 and Polysorbate 80. DMSO interfered with clinical chemistry measurements in serum. Urinary function was modified by HPgammaCD, DMSO, PEG 400, and Polysorbate 80, while enhanced urine enzyme excretion was observed after HPbetaCD, HPgammaCD, DMSO, PEG 400, and Polysorbate 80. DISCUSSION: Most of the investigated vehicles changed gastrointestinal, renal, and/or liver parameters after application of a certain threshold dose for each assay. No "best" vehicle could be identified that may be used in each test system. Thus, vehicles must be selected not only on their chemical characteristics but also on their potential pharmacological activity in a given test system.
INTRODUCTION: Solubility is often a limiting factor when testing new compounds in animal experiments. Various solubilizing agents may be used, but each have their own pharmacological effects. We investigated the effects of selected vehicles having different chemical characteristics on gastrointestinal, renal, and liver function. METHODS:Rats were treated orally, intravenously or intraperitoneally and gastric emptying, intestinal transit, renal, and liver function were investigated. RESULTS:Gastrointestinal motility was influenced by hydroxyethylcellulose, hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HPbetaCD), HPgammaCD, DMSO, polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400), fat emulsion, and the corresponding emulsifier. Liver function was affected by HPbetaCD, HPgammaCD, DMSO, PEG 400, Polysorbate 80, Cremophor RH 40, and fat emulsion. An increase in liver enzymes was observed after PEG 400 and Polysorbate 80. DMSO interfered with clinical chemistry measurements in serum. Urinary function was modified by HPgammaCD, DMSO, PEG 400, and Polysorbate 80, while enhanced urine enzyme excretion was observed after HPbetaCD, HPgammaCD, DMSO, PEG 400, and Polysorbate 80. DISCUSSION: Most of the investigated vehicles changed gastrointestinal, renal, and/or liver parameters after application of a certain threshold dose for each assay. No "best" vehicle could be identified that may be used in each test system. Thus, vehicles must be selected not only on their chemical characteristics but also on their potential pharmacological activity in a given test system.
Authors: Jelena R Mitrović; Branka Divović; Daniel E Knutson; Jelena B Đoković; Predrag J Vulić; Danijela V Randjelović; Vladimir D Dobričić; Bojan R Čalija; James M Cook; Miroslav M Savić; Snežana D Savić Journal: Eur J Pharm Sci Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 5.112
Authors: Ryan M Fryer; Mita Patel; Xiaomei Zhang; Katja S Baum-Kroker; Akalushi Muthukumarana; Brian Linehan; Yin-Chao Tseng Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Kyle A Windisch; Sanoara Mazid; Megan A Johnson; Elina Ashirova; Yan Zhou; Lennox Gergoire; Sydney Warwick; Bruce S McEwen; Mary Jeanne Kreek; Teresa A Milner Journal: Synapse Date: 2021-10 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Christina Schreier; Werner Kremer; Fritz Huber; Sindy Neumann; Philipp Pagel; Kai Lienemann; Sabine Pestel Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-06-23 Impact factor: 3.411