Literature DB >> 16566968

Technical modification of microsurgical varicocelectomy can reduce operating time.

Armand Zini1, Anthony Fischer, Debra Bellack, Mark Noss, Khaled Kamal, Victor Chow, Victor Mak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of a technical modification of the microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy on surgical operating time.
METHODS: We introduced a technical modification to the standard microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy (division of the spermatic cord package before microsurgical dissection) in January 1999, to simplify the procedure and reduce surgical operating time. We performed a retrospective review of surgical outcomes in 89 men who underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy before modification of the procedure and 76 men who underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy after modification of the procedure. We compared operating times (in minutes), intraoperative findings, improvement in semen parameters, and postoperative complications between the two groups.
RESULTS: Overall, 101 men underwent a left and 64 men bilateral microsurgical varicocelectomy. Operating time (mean +/- standard error of the mean) was significantly less for the modified procedure compared with standard microsurgical varicocelectomy (50.2 +/- 1.8 minutes versus 56.5 +/- 1.3 minutes for left-sided procedures and 81.7 +/- 2.6 minutes versus 104.0 +/- 4.0 minutes for bilateral procedures, respectively). No postoperative complications (including recurrence or clinical hydrocele) were identified at 6 weeks postoperatively. Total motile sperm count improved significantly in both groups after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified microsurgical varicocelectomy reduces surgical operating time significantly without compromising outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16566968     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.10.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  Varicocelectomy: microsurgical subinguinal technique is the treatment of choice.

Authors:  Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The use of titanium ligation clips in microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Mustafa Kıraç; Lütfi Tunç; Nuri Deniz; Hasan Biri
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-03

3.  Microsurgical intermediate subinguinal varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Ho Song Yu; Won Sik Ham; Dong Hyuk Kang; Kyu Hyun Kim; Doo Yong Chung; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

4.  Does varicocelectomy improve gonadal function in men with hypogonadism and infertility? Analysis of a prospective study.

Authors:  Vasan Sathya Srini; Srinivas Belur Veerachari
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.257

5.  Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the management of chronic scrotal pain.

Authors:  Stefanos Kachrilas; Elenko Popov; Andreas Bourdoumis; Waseem Akhter; Mohamed El Howairis; Ismaeel Aghaways; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Clinical effectiveness of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with enhanced recovery after surgery for varicocele.

Authors:  Xiaobin Wang; Ruipeng Wang; Qiang Du; Bochen Pan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

7.  Microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with spermatic cord double traction and vein stripping.

Authors:  Ru-Hui Tian; Liang-Yu Zhao; Hui-Xing Chen; Chao Yang; Peng Li; Yu-Hua Huang; Zhong Wan; Er-Lei Zhi; Chen-Cheng Yao; Zheng Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.