Literature DB >> 16566742

A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods.

Angela Piñeros-Fernandez1, Lisa S Salopek, Pamela F Rodeheaver, David B Drake, Richard F Edlich, George T Rodeheaver.   

Abstract

Six pigs were used to evaluate the influence of three separate modalities on contaminated wounds. Full-thickness skin wounds on the abdomen were contaminated with 10(4) or 10(5) Staphylococcus aureus and then closed with one of three methods. The three closure modalities included (1) a new absorbable staple (Insorb) placed in the subcuticular tissue, (2) a braided Vicryl suture, and (3) percutaneous metal staples. Any foreign body material implanted in tissue increases the risk of infection at that site. Wound closure always involves the use of a foreign body. Historically, sutures have been the primary material used to close tissue. The newer synthetic sutures are significangly more biodegradable and cause less infection than sutures composed of protein, such as silk and catgut. Metal staples are also associated with a low risk of infection. Recently, Incisive Surgical, Inc. (Plymouth, Minnesota) has developed an absorbable polymer staple specifically for subcuticular skin closure. The purpose of this study was to compare the new Insorb staple to both an absorbable polymer suture and a metal staple. Wound infection was assessed 7 days after closure by clinical signs and quantitative bacterial swabs. The results demonstrated that wounds closed with Insorb staples had the lowest incidence (33%) of infection, followed by percutaneous metal staples (44%). All wounds (100%) closed with Vicryl suture became infected. The incidence of wound infection directly correlated with the level of quantitative bacterial count at analysis. The Insorb staple was associated with significantly reduced closure time, less inflammation and infection, and better aesthetic result compared to Vicryl. Compared to metal staples, the Insorb subcuticular staplers demonstrated comparable closure time without the need for later staple removal. In conclusion, the closure of contaminated wounds with the Insorb staples is a superior choice to Vicryl suture because they have a significantly (p = 0.009) lower incidence of infection. The Insorb staple is a revolutionary advance in subcuticular skin stapling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16566742     DOI: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v16.i1.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants        ISSN: 1050-6934


  4 in total

1.  A comparative in vivo study of tissue reactions to four suturing materials.

Authors:  Shahla Kakoei; Fahimeh Baghaei; Shahriar Dabiri; Masoud Parirokh; Sina Kakooei
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2010-05-20

Review 2.  Cutaneous wound closure materials: an overview and update.

Authors:  Luluah Al-Mubarak; Mohammed Al-Haddab
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-10

3.  Donor-site closure using absorbable dermal staple for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: its efficacy and cosmetic outcomes.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Han; Seong Yeon Kim; Yoon Jae Lee; Suk Ho Moon; Deuk Young Oh
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-03-23

4.  Tissue reactivity and suture handling characteristics of "jimat" against silk and chromic gut in cat thigh muscle: A comparative study.

Authors:  Tilahun Bekele; A P Bhokre; Abreha Tesfaye
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2015-08-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.