Literature DB >> 16565787

Different responsiveness to mechanical stress of bone cells from osteoporotic versus osteoarthritic donors.

A D Bakker1, J Klein-Nulend, E Tanck, I C Heyligers, G H Albers, P Lips, E H Burger.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis (OP) and osteoarthritis (OA) are both common diseases in the elderly, but remarkably seldom coexist. The bone defects that are related to both diseases develop with increasing age, which suggests that they are related to some form of imperfect bone remodeling. Current opinion holds that the bone remodeling process is supervised by bone cells that respond to mechanical stimuli. An imperfect response of bone cells to mechanical stimuli might thus relate to imperfect bone remodeling, which could eventually lead to a lack bone mass and strength, such as in OP patients. MATERIALS: To investigate whether the cellular response to mechanical stress differs between OP and OA patients, we compared the response of bone cells from both groups to fluid shear stress of increasing magnitude. Bone cells from 9 female OP donors (age 60-90 year) and 9 female age-matched OA donors were subjected to pulsating fluid flow (PFF) of low (0.4+/-0.1 Pa at 3 Hz), medium (0.6+/-0.3 Pa at 5 Hz), or high shear stress (1.2+/-0.4 at 9Hz), or were kept under static culture conditions.
RESULTS: We found subtle differences in the shear-stress response of the two groups, measured as nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production. The NO-response to shear stress was higher in the OP than the OA cells, while the PGE2-response was higher in the OA cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that NO and PGE2 play a role in cell-cell communication during remodeling, these results suggest that slight differences in mechanotransduction might relate to the opposite bone defects in osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16565787     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0072-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  36 in total

1.  Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone.

Authors:  R Huiskes; R Ruimerman; G H van Lenthe; J D Janssen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Nitric oxide inhibitor L-NAME suppresses mechanically induced bone formation in rats.

Authors:  C H Turner; Y Takano; I Owan; G A Murrell
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1996-04

Review 3.  Arthritis and aging.

Authors:  A Abyad; J T Boyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis.

Authors:  B Li; R M Aspden
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Osteoporosis changes the amount of vertebral trabecular bone at risk of fracture but not the vertebral load distribution.

Authors:  J Homminga; H Weinans; W Gowin; D Felsenberg; R Huiskes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Steady and transient fluid shear stress stimulate NO release in osteoblasts through distinct biochemical pathways.

Authors:  T N McAllister; J A Frangos
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Sensitivity of osteocytes to biomechanical stress in vitro.

Authors:  J Klein-Nulend; A van der Plas; C M Semeins; N E Ajubi; J A Frangos; P J Nijweide; E H Burger
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Relative contributions of aging and estrogen deficiency to postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  L S Richelson; H W Wahner; L J Melton; B L Riggs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Inducible cyclo-oxygenase (COX-2) mediates the induction of bone formation by mechanical loading in vivo.

Authors:  M R Forwood
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Response of normal and osteoporotic human bone cells to mechanical stress in vitro.

Authors:  J G Sterck; J Klein-Nulend; P Lips; E H Burger
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1998-06
View more
  12 in total

1.  Prostaglandin E(2) is crucial in the response of podocytes to fluid flow shear stress.

Authors:  Tarak Srivastava; Ellen T McCarthy; Ram Sharma; Patricia A Cudmore; Mukut Sharma; Mark L Johnson; Lynda F Bonewald
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.782

2.  Bone Physiology, Biomaterial and the Effect of Mechanical/Physical Microenvironment on MSC Osteogenesis: A Tribute to Shu Chien's 80th Birthday.

Authors:  Xiaoling Liao; Shaoying Lu; Yue Zhuo; Christina Winter; Wenfeng Xu; Bo Li; Yingxiao Wang
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.321

Review 3.  Osteocyte-Mediated Translation of Mechanical Stimuli to Cellular Signaling and Its Role in Bone and Non-bone-Related Clinical Complications.

Authors:  Yongyong Yan; Liping Wang; Linhu Ge; Janak L Pathak
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Bone mineral density is not related to severity of osteoarthritis in the knee in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Hakan Atalar; Burcu Yanik; Burcin Ozcakar; Ebru Atalar; Asli Koktener
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  CXCL8 and CCL20 Enhance Osteoclastogenesis via Modulation of Cytokine Production by Human Primary Osteoblasts.

Authors:  Janak L Pathak; Astrid D Bakker; Patrick Verschueren; Willem F Lems; Frank P Luyten; Jenneke Klein-Nulend; Nathalie Bravenboer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mechanical loading reduces inflammation-induced human osteocyte-to-osteoclast communication.

Authors:  Janak L Pathak; N Bravenboer; Frank P Luyten; Patrick Verschueren; Willem F Lems; Jenneke Klein-Nulend; Astrid D Bakker
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  IL-6 and IGF-1 Signaling Within and Between Muscle and Bone: How Important is the mTOR Pathway for Bone Metabolism?

Authors:  Astrid D Bakker; Richard T Jaspers
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Macro and microfluidic flows for skeletal regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Brandon D Riehl; Jung Yul Lim
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 9.  Diet and Exercise: a Match Made in Bone.

Authors:  Hubertine M E Willems; Ellen G H M van den Heuvel; Ruud J W Schoemaker; Jenneke Klein-Nulend; Astrid D Bakker
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 10.  Aging, Osteocytes, and Mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Haniyeh Hemmatian; Astrid D Bakker; Jenneke Klein-Nulend; G Harry van Lenthe
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.