Literature DB >> 16565759

Human limbal progenitor cell characteristics are maintained in tissue culture.

Shaohui Liu1, Jing Li, Chuanfu Wang, Donald Tan, Roger Beuerman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To determine the differentiation of human limbal epithelial cells in tissue culture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Epithelial cells from the human limbus (n = 29) were isolated and cultured in supplemental hormonal epithelial medium (SHEM) in the presence of mitomycin C-treated 3T3 feeder layer. Confluent cells were airlifted to form multiple layers. The expression of cytokeratin 3 (K3), cytokeratin 12 (K12), involucrin, connexin 43 (Cx43), proliferation cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and p63 was studied in normal and airlifted cells by immunohistochemistry. Expression levels of K3 and K12 mRNA were examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
RESULTS: The colony-forming efficiency of primary cultured (P0) cells was about 19.35 +/- 6.46% (mean +/- SD, n = 7). Real-time PCR analysis showed that the transcription level of K3 and K12 in cultured cells was lower than in freshly isolated limbal cells or cells from central cornea (P <0.01). Few cells were positive for K3 in P0 or P1 cells [(1.99 +/- 1.27)% (n = 7, P0) and (3.96 +/- 1.35)% (n = 4, P1), P = 0.046]. More cells at all levels were found to stain positive for PCNA and p63 as compared to K3, K12 and involucrin. After air-lifting, cell sheets of 3 to 5 epithelial cell layers formed. Involucrin showed positive staining in suprabasal layers of the cell sheets while connexin 43 was only observed in the basal layer. Staining of K3 remained sparse.
CONCLUSIONS: Human limbal cells isolated from cadaveric tissues were able to proliferate in vitro and exhibited a phenotype with characteristics similar to that of the limbal stem or progenitor cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16565759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore        ISSN: 0304-4602            Impact factor:   2.473


  6 in total

1.  Adult human buccal epithelial stem cells: identification, ex-vivo expansion, and transplantation for corneal surface reconstruction.

Authors:  C G Priya; P Arpitha; S Vaishali; N V Prajna; K Usha; K Sheetal; V Muthukkaruppan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Greater growth potential of p63-positive epithelial cell clusters maintained in human limbal epithelial sheets.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kawakita; Shigeto Shimmura; Kazunari Higa; Edgar M Espana; Hua He; Jun Shimazaki; Kazuo Tsubota; Scheffer C G Tseng
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  S100A expression in normal corneal-limbal epithelial cells and ocular surface squamous cell carcinoma tissue.

Authors:  Jing Li; Andri K Riau; Melina Setiawan; Jodhbir S Mehta; Seng-Ei Ti; Louis Tong; Donald T H Tan; Roger W Beuerman
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 2.367

4.  Synthetic vs natural scaffolds for human limbal stem cells.

Authors:  Mirna Tominac Trcin; Iva Dekaris; Budimir Mijović; Marina Bujić; Emilija Zdraveva; Tamara Dolenec; Maja Pauk-Gulić; Dragan Primorac; Josip Crnjac; Branimira Špoljarić; Gordan Mršić; Krunoslav Kuna; Daniel Špoljarić; Maja Popović
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 5.  An Insight into the Difficulties in the Discovery of Specific Biomarkers of Limbal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Zhi Hou Guo; Wei Zhang; Yang Yan Sheng Jia; Qing Xiu Liu; Zhao Fa Li; Jun Sheng Lin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  A serum- and feeder-free technique of culturing human corneal epithelial stem cells on amniotic membrane.

Authors:  Kaevalin Lekhanont; Lulin Choubtum; Roy S Chuck; Tarinee Sa-ngiampornpanit; Varintorn Chuckpaiwong; Anun Vongthongsri
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.367

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.