Literature DB >> 16565026

Perception of blood transfusion risk.

David Lee1.   

Abstract

Perceptions of risk ultimately drive the responses of individuals and society to risk issues, and transfusion risk is no exception. Surveys of lay people over the past decade indicate that public concern about transfusion safety has remained prevalent, dominated by the ongoing fear of contracting HIV infection. Such perceptions persist despite the acknowledgment that blood transfusion is safer now than in years past. Judgements by the lay public that may, at first glance, seem irrational can often be understood when the heuristics, biases, and models of human judgements of risk are considered. Risk perception research suggests that how lay people perceive risk has less to do with the unidimensional view of risk as a probabilistic expression and more to do with a complex multidimensional construct in which affect, reason, worldviews, trust, and other factors are intertwined. This review summarizes some of the principles of risk perception as applicable to transfusion medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16565026     DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2005.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med Rev        ISSN: 0887-7963


  5 in total

1.  Safety in transfusion medicine.

Authors:  Giuseppe Aprili
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  ["Blood is thicker than water"].

Authors:  J Meier
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  When are infection risks of blood transfusion tolerable? Towards understanding the ethical views of stakeholders in the blood supply.

Authors:  Koen Kramer; Marcel F Verweij; Hans L Zaaijer
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  The public's risk perception of blood transfusion in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Adel F Almutairi; Mahmoud Salam; Oraynab Abou Abbas; Maliha Nasim; Abdallah A Adlan
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2018-06-05

5.  Risk perception of blood transfusions - a comparison of patients and allied healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Jan A Graw; Katja Eymann; Felix Kork; Martin Zoremba; Rene Burchard
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.