PURPOSE: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the impact of pretreatment factors on quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pretreatment QOL (via Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy [FACT], version 2) was obtained in 1,428 patients in several prospective Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials including nonmetastatic head-and-neck (n = 1139), esophageal (n = 174), lung (n = 51), rectal (n = 47), and prostate (n = 17) cancer patients. Clinically meaningful differences between groups were defined as a difference of 1 standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: The mean FACT score for all patients was 86 (20.7-112) with SEM of 5.3. Statistically significant differences in QOL were observed based on age, race, Karnofsky Performance Status, marital status, education level, income level, and employment status, but not by gender or primary site. Using the SEM, there were clinically meaningful differences between patients </=50 years vs. >/=65 years. Hispanics had worse QOL than whites. FACT increased linearly with higher Karnofsky Performance Status and income levels. Married patients (or live-in relationships) had a better QOL than single, divorced, or widowed patients. College graduates had better QOL than those with less education. CONCLUSION: Most pretreatment factors meaningfully influenced baseline QOL. The potentially devastating impact of a cancer diagnosis, particularly in young and minority patients, must be addressed.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the impact of pretreatment factors on quality of life (QOL) in cancerpatients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pretreatment QOL (via Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy [FACT], version 2) was obtained in 1,428 patients in several prospective Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials including nonmetastatic head-and-neck (n = 1139), esophageal (n = 174), lung (n = 51), rectal (n = 47), and prostate (n = 17) cancerpatients. Clinically meaningful differences between groups were defined as a difference of 1 standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: The mean FACT score for all patients was 86 (20.7-112) with SEM of 5.3. Statistically significant differences in QOL were observed based on age, race, Karnofsky Performance Status, marital status, education level, income level, and employment status, but not by gender or primary site. Using the SEM, there were clinically meaningful differences between patients </=50 years vs. >/=65 years. Hispanics had worse QOL than whites. FACT increased linearly with higher Karnofsky Performance Status and income levels. Married patients (or live-in relationships) had a better QOL than single, divorced, or widowed patients. College graduates had better QOL than those with less education. CONCLUSION: Most pretreatment factors meaningfully influenced baseline QOL. The potentially devastating impact of a cancer diagnosis, particularly in young and minority patients, must be addressed.
Authors: Vivian E von Gruenigen; Helen Q Huang; Karen M Gil; Heidi E Gibbons; Bradley J Monk; Peter G Rose; Deborah K Armstrong; David Cella; Lari Wenzel Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Horia Vulpe; Janet Ellis; Shao Hui Huang; Eshetu G Atenafu; Raymond W Jang; Gary Rodin; Jolie Ringash Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Canhua Xiao; Alexandra Hanlon; Qiang Zhang; Benjamin Movsas; Kian Ang; David I Rosenthal; P Félix Nguyen-Tan; Harold Kim; Quynh Le; Deborah Watkins Bruner Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Bryce B Reeve; Jianwen Cai; Hongtao Zhang; Jaeun Choi; Mark C Weissler; David Cella; Andrew F Olshan Journal: Head Neck Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Robert C Miller; Pamela J Atherton; Brian F Kabat; Mary B Fredericksen; Debra M Geno; Claude Deschamps; Aminah Jatoi; Jeff A Sloan; Yvonne Romero Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2010-01-22 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Francis P Worden; Jeffrey Moyer; Julia S Lee; Jeremy M G Taylor; Susan G Urba; Avraham Eisbruch; Theodoros N Teknos; Douglas B Chepeha; Mark E Prince; Norman Hogikyan; Amy Anne D Lassig; Kevin Emerick; Suresh Mukherji; Lubomir Hadjiski; Christina I Tsien; Tamara H Miller; Nancy E Wallace; Heidi L Mason; Carol R Bradford; Gregory T Wolf Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Elise L Lev; Lucille Sanzero Eller; Glen Gejerman; John Kolassa; Joan Colella; Janine Pezzino; Patricia Lane; Ravi Munver; Michael Esposito; John Sheuch; Vincent Lanteri; Ihor Sawczuk Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-08-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marko Popovic; Nicholas Lao; Liang Zeng; Liying Zhang; David Cella; Jennifer L Beaumont; Ronald Chow; Nicholas Chiu; Leonard Chiu; Henry Lam; Michael Poon; Edward Chow Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: D Cella; M D Michaelson; A G Bushmakin; J C Cappelleri; C Charbonneau; S T Kim; J Z Li; R J Motzer Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-01-26 Impact factor: 7.640