Literature DB >> 1656458

Inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II prevent chromatid separation in mammalian cells but do not prevent exit from mitosis.

C S Downes1, A M Mullinger, R T Johnson.   

Abstract

DNA topoisomerase II (EC 5.99.1.3) is necessary for chromosome condensation and disjunction in yeast but not for other functions. In mammalian cells, it has been reported to be necessary for progression toward mitosis but not for transit through mitosis. We have found, on the contrary, that specific inhibition of topoisomerase II (but not of topoisomerase I) interferes with mammalian mitotic progression. Metaphase is prolonged, and anaphase separation of chromatids is completely inhibited, in cells given high concentrations of topoisomerase II inhibitors; nevertheless these cells attempt cleavage, sometimes generating nucleate and anucleate daughters. Lower concentrations of inhibitors interfere with anaphase and produce abnormalities of segregation. DNA topoisomerase II activity is therefore necessary for mammalian chromatid separation, but it is not tightly coupled to the control of other mitotic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1656458      PMCID: PMC52617          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.8895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

1.  New topoisomerase essential for chromosome segregation in E. coli.

Authors:  J Kato; Y Nishimura; R Imamura; H Niki; S Hiraga; H Suzuki
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-10-19       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  DNA topoisomerase II is required for formation of mitotic chromosomes in Chinese hamster ovary cells: studies using the inhibitor 4'-demethylepipodophyllotoxin 9-(4,6-O-thenylidene-beta-D-glucopyranoside).

Authors:  M Charron; R Hancock
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-10-16       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  DNA topoisomerases and DNA repair.

Authors:  C S Downes; R T Johnson
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Defective post-replication recovery and u.v. sensitivity in a simian virus 40-transformed Indian muntjac cell line.

Authors:  L Pillidge; C S Downes; R T Johnson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1986-07

5.  Hypothesis: some mutagens directly alter specific chromosomal proteins (DNA topoisomerase II and peripheral proteins) to produce chromosome stickiness, which causes chromosome aberrations.

Authors:  M E Gaulden
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Perturbation of mammalian cell division: human mini segregants derived from mitotic cells.

Authors:  R T Johnson; A M Mullinger; R J Skaer
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1975-06-17

7.  DNA topoisomerase II is required for condensation and separation of mitotic chromosomes in S. pombe.

Authors:  T Uemura; H Ohkura; Y Adachi; K Morino; K Shiozaki; M Yanagida
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The topoisomerase II inhibitor VM-26 induces marked changes in histone H1 kinase activity, histones H1 and H3 phosphorylation, and chromosome condensation in G2 phase and mitotic BHK cells.

Authors:  M Roberge; J Th'ng; J Hamaguchi; E M Bradbury
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Mitotic spindle pulls but fails to separate chromosomes in type II DNA topoisomerase mutants: uncoordinated mitosis.

Authors:  T Uemura; M Tanagida
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  The F1 ATP synthetase beta-subunit: a major yeast novobiocin binding protein.

Authors:  J R Jenkins; M J Pocklington; E Orr
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  35 in total

1.  Etoposide induces heritable chromosomal aberrations and aneuploidy during male meiosis in the mouse.

Authors:  F Marchetti; J B Bishop; X Lowe; W M Generoso; J Hozier; A J Wyrobek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Co-localization of centromere activity, proteins and topoisomerase II within a subdomain of the major human X alpha-satellite array.

Authors:  Jennifer M Spence; Ricky Critcher; Thomas A Ebersole; Manuel M Valdivia; William C Earnshaw; Tatsuo Fukagawa; Christine J Farr
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Topoisomerase II: untangling its contribution at the centromere.

Authors:  Andrew C G Porter; Christine J Farr
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Contribution of hCAP-D2, a non-SMC subunit of condensin I, to chromosome and chromosomal protein dynamics during mitosis.

Authors:  Erwan Watrin; Vincent Legagneux
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  DNA topoisomerase II and its growing repertoire of biological functions.

Authors:  John L Nitiss
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  DNA topoisomerase II is a determinant of the tensile properties of yeast centromeric chromatin and the tension checkpoint.

Authors:  Tariq H Warsi; Michelle S Navarro; Jeff Bachant
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  The distribution of topoisomerase II on mammalian chromosomes.

Authors:  A T Sumner
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Are proteasomes involved in the formation of the kinetochore?

Authors:  N Paweletz; C Wójcik; D Schroeter; E M Finze
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 9.  Forces on chromosomal DNA during anaphase.

Authors:  G Jannink; B Duplantier; J L Sikorav
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  SUMO modification of DNA topoisomerase II: trying to get a CENse of it all.

Authors:  Ming-Ta Lee; Jeff Bachant
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.