Literature DB >> 16564185

Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces.

Lichan Liu1, Andreas A Ioannides.   

Abstract

Most neuroimaging studies on face processing used centrally presented images with a relatively large visual field. Images presented in this way activate widespread striate and extrastriate areas and make it difficult to study spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences from various parts of the visual field. Here we studied magnetoencephalographic responses in humans to centrally and peripherally presented faces for testing the hypothesis that processing of visual stimuli with facial expressions of emotions depends on where the stimuli are presented in the visual field. Using our tomographic and statistical parametric mapping analyses, we identified occipitotemporal areas activated by face stimuli more than by control conditions. V1/V2 activity was significantly stronger for lower than central and upper visual field presentation. Fusiform activity, however, was significantly stronger for central than for peripheral presentation. Both the V1/V2 and fusiform areas activated earlier for peripheral than for central presentation. Fast responses in the fusiform were found at 70-80 ms after image onset, as well as a response at 130-160 ms. For peripheral presentation, contralateral V1/V2 and fusiform activated earlier (10 ms and 23 ms, respectively) and significantly stronger than their ipsilateral counterparts. Mutual information analysis further showed linked activity from bilateral V1/V2 to fusiform for central presentation and from contralateral V1/V2 to fusiform for lower visual field presentation. In the upper visual field, the linkage was from fusiform to V1/V2. Our results showed that face stimuli are processed predominantly in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulation and demonstrated for the first time early fusiform activation leading V1/V2 activation for upper visual field stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16564185     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  11 in total

1.  Visual field and task influence illusory figure responses.

Authors:  Afiza Abu Bakar; Lichan Liu; Markus Conci; Mark A Elliott; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG.

Authors:  Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Joachim Gross
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Coarse threat images reveal theta oscillations in the amygdala: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Frances A Maratos; Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley; Gina Rippon; Carl Senior
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Functional specialization and dynamic resource allocation in visual cortex.

Authors:  Gijs Plomp; Cees van Leeuwen; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Emotion separation is completed early and it depends on visual field presentation.

Authors:  Lichan Liu; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Stimulus-contrast-induced biases in activation order reveal interaction between V1/V2 and human MT+.

Authors:  Masaki Maruyama; Daniel D Palomo; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Diverting attention suppresses human amygdala responses to faces.

Authors:  Carmen Morawetz; Juergen Baudewig; Stefan Treue; Peter Dechent
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Source space analysis of event-related dynamic reorganization of brain networks.

Authors:  Andreas A Ioannides; Stavros I Dimitriadis; George A Saridis; Marotesa Voultsidou; Vahe Poghosyan; Lichan Liu; Nikolaos A Laskaris
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  An FMRI study of word reading and colour recognition in different quadrant fields.

Authors:  Tadashi Ino; Ryusuke Nakai; Takashi Azuma; Kazuki Tokumoto; Kiyohide Usami; Toru Kimura
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2008-08-12

10.  Specific components of face perception in the human fusiform gyrus studied by tomographic estimates of magnetoencephalographic signals: a tool for the evaluation of non-verbal communication in psychosomatic paradigms.

Authors:  Yuka Okazaki; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Biopsychosoc Med       Date:  2007-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.