Literature DB >> 16563700

Switch and maintenance of task set in schizophrenia.

Paul D Kieffaber1, Emily S Kappenman, Misty Bodkins, Anantha Shekhar, Brian F O'Donnell, William P Hetrick.   

Abstract

Task set maintenance and switching deficits are robust in schizophrenia. However, little is known about how these constructs are related to one another. The development of an improved understanding of set switching and maintenance deficits in schizophrenia requires that these constructs be explicated in terms of elementary cognitive processes rather than grouped into broad psychological concepts like executive functioning. A relevant dichotomy has been proposed in which sensory and perceptual ("attentional") processes are distinguished from decisional ("intentional") processes in task maintenance and switching; however, the contributions these processes make to performance deficits in schizophrenia is not known. In the present study, 30 participants with schizophrenia and 27 healthy comparisons completed a cued attentional set switching task. In addition to analyses of mean response times, the contributions of attentional and intentional processes to task performance were estimated using an ex-Gaussian distributional analysis. Schizophrenia was associated with a set maintenance deficit that was accounted for by an attentional, rather than intentional, dysfunction. Both groups showed significant switch costs that could be attributed to attentional processes, but there was no evidence for an attentional set switching deficit in schizophrenia. The findings suggest that set switching and set maintenance may reflect distinct cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and that they may be associated with unique information processing mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16563700     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  22 in total

Review 1.  N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor dysfunction or dysregulation: the final common pathway on the road to schizophrenia?

Authors:  Joshua T Kantrowitz; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Event related brain potential evidence for preserved attentional set switching in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Paul D Kieffaber; Brian F O'Donnell; Anantha Shekhar; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Dora Matzke; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

Review 4.  Non-Gaussian Distributional Analyses of Reaction Times (RT): Improvements that Increase Efficacy of RT Tasks for Describing Cognitive Processes.

Authors:  David C Osmon; Dmitriy Kazakov; Octavio Santos; Michelle T Kassel
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 5.  Mechanistic classification of neural circuit dysfunctions: insights from neuroeconomics research in animals.

Authors:  Steve W C Chang; David L Barack; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  RT distributional analysis of cognitive-control-related brain activity in first-episode schizophrenia.

Authors:  Catherine Fassbender; Katie Scangos; Tyler A Lesh; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Reaction time variability and related brain activity in methamphetamine psychosis.

Authors:  Catherine Fassbender; Tyler A Lesh; Stefan Ursu; Ruth Salo
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 8.  Thinking glutamatergically: changing concepts of schizophrenia based upon changing neurochemical models.

Authors:  Joshua T Kantrowitz; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses       Date:  2010-10

9.  Task-switching in schizophrenia: active switching costs and passive carry-over effects in an antisaccade paradigm.

Authors:  Cathleen Greenzang; Dara S Manoach; Donald C Goff; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching.

Authors:  Paul D Kieffaber; John K Kruschke; Raymond Y Cho; Philip M Walker; William P Hetrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.