Literature DB >> 16563654

Rectal-wall dose dependence on postplan timing after permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy.

Daniel Taussky1, Ivan Yeung, Theresa Williams, Shannon Pearson, Michael McLean, Gregory Pond, Juanita Crook.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dose to rectal wall after permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy is dependent on distance between posterior prostatic seeds and anterior rectal wall and is influenced by postimplant periprostatic edema. We analyzed the effect of postplan timing on anterior rectal-wall dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients received permanent seed 125I brachytherapy as monotherapy (145 Gy). Implants were preplanned by use of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and carried out by use of preloaded needles. Postimplant dosimetry was calculated by use of magnetic resonance imaging-computed tomography fusion on Days 1, 8, and 30. The anterior rectal-wall dose is reported as the isodose enclosing 1.0 or 2.0 cc of rectal wall and as the RV100 in cc.
RESULTS: The dose to rectal wall increased progressively over time. The median increase in dose to 1.0 cc of rectal wall (RD [1 cc]) from Day 1 to 30 was 39.2 Gy (p < 0.001). RV100 increased from a median of 0.07 cc on Day 1 to 0.67 cc on Day 30. The most significant predictor of rectal-wall dose (RD [1 cc], RD [2 cc], or RV100) was the time of evaluation (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Although periprostatic edema cannot be quantified by postimplant imaging, the dose to the anterior rectal wall increases significantly over time as prostatic and periprostatic edema resolve. Critical-organ dose reporting and guidelines for minimizing toxicity must take into account the time of the assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16563654     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Preimplant factors affecting postimplant CT-determined prostate volume and the CT/TRUS volume ratio after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with 125I free seeds.

Authors:  Akitomo Sugawara; Jun Nakashima; Etsuo Kunieda; Hirohiko Nagata; Hirotaka Asakura; Mototsugu Oya; Naoyuki Shigematsu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Good servants, poor masters.

Authors:  Louis-Olivier Gagnon; Martin E Gleave
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  A comparison of acute and chronic toxicity for men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or (125)I permanent implant.

Authors:  Thomas N Eade; Eric M Horwitz; Karen Ruth; Mark K Buyyounouski; David J D'Ambrosio; Steven J Feigenberg; David Y T Chen; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Narrow safety range of intraoperative rectal irradiation exposure volume for avoiding bleeding after seed implant brachytherapy.

Authors:  Ryuji Nakamura; Koyo Kikuchi; Susumu Tanji; Tomonori Yabuuchi; Ikuko Uwano; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Hisanori Ariga; Tomoaki Fujioka
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Impact of target area selection in 125 Iodine seed brachytherapy on locoregional recurrence in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Liang Yan; Jin-Shuang Lv; Zhi-Yu Guan; Li-Yang Wang; Jing-Kui Yang; Ji-Xiang Liang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  A commentary on 125I seed brachytherapy for refractory loco-regional recurrence of non-anaplastic thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Yamei Wang; Haiyang Wang; Huawen Xia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Influence of body mass index and periprostatic fat on rectal dosimetry in permanent seed prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  David Tiberi; Nelson Gruszczynski; Aliza Meissner; Guila Delouya; Daniel Taussky
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.