Literature DB >> 16562985

Characterizing bitterness: identification of key structural features and development of a classification model.

Sarah Rodgers1, Robert C Glen, Andreas Bender.   

Abstract

This work describes the first approach in the development of a comprehensive classification method for bitterness of small molecules. The data set comprises 649 bitter and 13 530 randomly selected molecules from the MDL Drug Data Repository (MDDR) which are analyzed by circular fingerprints (MOLPRINT 2D) and information-gain feature selection. The feature selection proposes substructural features which are statistically correlated to bitterness. Classification is performed on the selected features via a naïve Bayes classifier. The substructural features upon which the classification is based are able to discriminate between bitter and random compounds, and thus we propose they are also functionally responsible for causing the bitter taste. Such substructures include various sugar moieties as well as highly branched carbon scaffolds. Cynaropicrine contains a number of the substructural features found to be statistically associated with bitterness and thus was correctly predicted to be bitter by our model. Alternatively, both promethazine and saccharin contain fewer of these substructural features, and thus the bitterness in these compounds was not identified. Two different classes of bitter compounds were identified, namely those which are larger and contain mainly oxygen and carbon and often sugar moieties, and those which are rather smaller and contain additional nitrogen and/or sulfur fragments. The classifier is able to predict 72.1% of the bitter compounds. Feature selection reduces the number of false-positives while also increasing the number of false negatives to 69.5% of bitter compounds correctly predicted. Overall, the method presented here presents both one of the largest databases of bitter compounds presently available as well as a relatively reliable classification method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16562985     DOI: 10.1021/ci0504418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  8 in total

1.  Prodrugs for masking bitter taste of antibacterial drugs--a computational approach.

Authors:  Rafik Karaman
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Positive allosteric modulators of the human sweet taste receptor enhance sweet taste.

Authors:  Guy Servant; Catherine Tachdjian; Xiao-Qing Tang; Sara Werner; Feng Zhang; Xiaodong Li; Poonit Kamdar; Goran Petrovic; Tanya Ditschun; Antoniette Java; Paul Brust; Nicole Brune; Grant E DuBois; Mark Zoller; Donald S Karanewsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bitter or not? BitterPredict, a tool for predicting taste from chemical structure.

Authors:  Ayana Dagan-Wiener; Ido Nissim; Natalie Ben Abu; Gigliola Borgonovo; Angela Bassoli; Masha Y Niv
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Physical approaches to masking bitter taste: lessons from food and pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  John N Coupland; John E Hayes
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  BitterDB: a database of bitter compounds.

Authors:  Ayana Wiener; Marina Shudler; Anat Levit; Masha Y Niv
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Support vector inductive logic programming outperforms the naive Bayes classifier and inductive logic programming for the classification of bioactive chemical compounds.

Authors:  Edward O Cannon; Ata Amini; Andreas Bender; Michael J E Sternberg; Stephen H Muggleton; Robert C Glen; John B O Mitchell
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.179

7.  e-Bitter: Bitterant Prediction by the Consensus Voting From the Machine-Learning Methods.

Authors:  Suqing Zheng; Mengying Jiang; Chengwei Zhao; Rui Zhu; Zhicheng Hu; Yong Xu; Fu Lin
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.221

8.  AlPOs synthetic factor analysis based on maximum weight and minimum redundancy feature selection.

Authors:  Yuting Guo; Jianzhong Wang; Na Gao; Miao Qi; Ming Zhang; Jun Kong; Yinghua Lv
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.