Literature DB >> 16562561

The role of silent intervals for sentence intelligibility in fluctuating noise in hearing-impaired listeners.

Kirsten Carola Wagener1, Thomas Brand, Birger Kollmeier.   

Abstract

Fluctuating interfering noises are highly suitable for speech audiometry because of the large inter-individual variability in intelligibility results. This study explores the maximum duration of silent intervals in the masker as an important factor underlying sentence intelligibility in fluctuating noise. Three versions of speech-simulating fluctuating interfering noises based on the icra noises (Dreschler et al, 2001) were explored: The original noise which simulates one interfering speaker and contains pause durations up to two seconds, as well as two modified versions with pause durations limited to 250 ms and 62.5 ms, respectively. In addition, a stationary speech-shaped noise was used. Test-retest reliability as well as speech reception threshold (SRT) and speech intelligibility function slope were determined with hearing-impaired subjects. All fluctuating noises differentiated very well between subjects. Partial rank correlation analysis showed that SRTs in fluctuating noise with longest maximum pause durations mostly depended on SRTs in quiet. SRTs in fluctuating noises with smaller maximum pause durations correlated both with SRTs in quiet and in stationary noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16562561     DOI: 10.1080/14992020500243851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  13 in total

1.  [Examination of speech perception and cognitive functioning in the elderly].

Authors:  H Meister; S Schreitmüller; L Grugel; M Landwehr; H von Wedel; M Walger; I Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  [Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].

Authors:  B Kollmeier; T Lenarz; A Winkler; M A Zokoll; H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  The design of a project to assess bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Stuart Gatehouse; Jürgen Kiessling; Graham Naylor; Hans Verschuure; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

5.  Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Dorothea Wendt; Torsten Dau; Jens Hjortkjær
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-10

6.  Comparing Eye Tracking with Electrooculography for Measuring Individual Sentence Comprehension Duration.

Authors:  Jana Annina Müller; Dorothea Wendt; Birger Kollmeier; Thomas Brand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sentence Recognition Prediction for Hearing-impaired Listeners in Stationary and Fluctuation Noise With FADE: Empowering the Attenuation and Distortion Concept by Plomp With a Quantitative Processing Model.

Authors:  Birger Kollmeier; Marc René Schädler; Anna Warzybok; Bernd T Meyer; Thomas Brand
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 8.  Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings.

Authors:  Sabine Haumann; Volker Hohmann; Markus Meis; Tobias Herzke; Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2012-08-14

9.  How hearing impairment affects sentence comprehension: using eye fixations to investigate the duration of speech processing.

Authors:  Dorothea Wendt; Birger Kollmeier; Thomas Brand
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Relations Between the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise and Psychophysical Measures of Hearing Measured in Four Languages Using the Auditory Profile Test Battery.

Authors:  T E M Van Esch; W A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.