Literature DB >> 16558548

Athletic training education programs: to rank or not to rank?

C A Voll1, J E Goodwin, W A Pitney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the literature regarding educational program ranking and to provide insights concerning undergraduate and graduate athletic training education ranking systems.
BACKGROUND: The demand for accountability and the need to evaluate the quality of educational programs have led to program ranking in many academic disciplines. As athletic training becomes more recognized within the medical community, determining a program's quality will become increasingly important. DESCRIPTION: We describe program rankings used in other disciplines for determining quality and providing measures of accountability. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of both subjective and objective ranking systems, as well as the arguments for using program rankings in athletic training. Future directions for program ranking and potential research questions are suggested. APPLICATIONS: Ranking systems on the basis of levels of perceived quality and academic productivity of programs that prepare future professionals will help potential undergraduate and graduate students make informed decisions when selecting an educational program.

Year:  1999        PMID: 16558548      PMCID: PMC1322874     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  4 in total

1.  Reputational ratings of doctoral programs.

Authors:  R T Hartnett; M J Clark; L L Baird
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition.

Authors:  D Crane
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  1965-10

3.  Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions.

Authors:  J M Garfunkel; M H Ulshen; H J Hamrick; E E Lawson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A national survey of athletic trainer roles and responsibilities in the allied clinical setting.

Authors:  K M Duncan; K E Wright
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.860

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Curricular satisfaction levels of National Athletic Trainers' Association-accredited postprofessional athletic training graduates.

Authors:  Kevin J Henry; Bonnie L Van Lunen; Brian Udermann; James A Oñate
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.