BACKGROUND: Multidrug resistance (MDR) has a potentially serious influence on cancer treatment and should be taken into consideration in the design and application of therapeutic regimens. It is mediated through the activity of cellular pumps. AIM: To investigate whether furosemide, itself a pump-blocker, reverses MDR in an in vitro model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An MDR bladder cancer cell line (MGH-u 1R) and its parental (drug sensitive) clone were exposed to epirubicin and furosemide, with the concentration of one drug fixed and that of the other serially diluted in a 96-well plate format. Both drugs formed the variable component in separate experiments. After a 1-h exposure, the cells were washed and replenished with fresh medium. To examine the toxicity of epirubicin and furosemide separately and in combination, monotetrazolium-based assays were carried out. Intracellular epirubicin distribution was assessed by confocal microscopy as a second index of resistance status after in vitro exposure. RESULTS: MGH-u 1R cells incubated with furosemide showed distribution of drug similar to that in the parental cells (MGH-u 1 sensitive). Controls (without furosemide) continued to show a resistant pattern of fluorescence. In cytotoxicity assays furosemide appeared substantially non-toxic. Resistant cells in the toxicity titration experiments showed increased resistance to levels of furosemide over 500 mug/ml. Parental cells were made only marginally more sensitive against increased background toxicity. CONCLUSION: Furosemide is effective in reversing MDR status in bladder cancer cell lines in vitro. It may also have an increment of intrinsic cytotoxicity, but only at higher concentrations. We propose a potential for further investigation of furosemide as an adjunct to chemotherapy for superficial bladder cancer.
BACKGROUND: Multidrug resistance (MDR) has a potentially serious influence on cancer treatment and should be taken into consideration in the design and application of therapeutic regimens. It is mediated through the activity of cellular pumps. AIM: To investigate whether furosemide, itself a pump-blocker, reverses MDR in an in vitro model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An MDR bladder cancer cell line (MGH-u 1R) and its parental (drug sensitive) clone were exposed to epirubicin and furosemide, with the concentration of one drug fixed and that of the other serially diluted in a 96-well plate format. Both drugs formed the variable component in separate experiments. After a 1-h exposure, the cells were washed and replenished with fresh medium. To examine the toxicity of epirubicin and furosemide separately and in combination, monotetrazolium-based assays were carried out. Intracellular epirubicin distribution was assessed by confocal microscopy as a second index of resistance status after in vitro exposure. RESULTS: MGH-u 1R cells incubated with furosemide showed distribution of drug similar to that in the parental cells (MGH-u 1 sensitive). Controls (without furosemide) continued to show a resistant pattern of fluorescence. In cytotoxicity assays furosemide appeared substantially non-toxic. Resistant cells in the toxicity titration experiments showed increased resistance to levels of furosemide over 500 mug/ml. Parental cells were made only marginally more sensitive against increased background toxicity. CONCLUSION:Furosemide is effective in reversing MDR status in bladder cancer cell lines in vitro. It may also have an increment of intrinsic cytotoxicity, but only at higher concentrations. We propose a potential for further investigation of furosemide as an adjunct to chemotherapy for superficial bladder cancer.
Authors: D A Tolley; M K Parmar; K M Grigor; G Lallemand; L L Benyon; J Fellows; L S Freedman; K M Grigor; R R Hall; T B Hargreave; K Munson; D W Newling; B Richards; M R Robinson; M B Rose; P H Smith; J L Williams; P Whelan Journal: J Urol Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jonathan M Featherstone; Alan G Speers; Bashir A Lwaleed; Matthew C Hayes; Alan J Cooper; Brian R Birch Journal: BJU Int Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Véronique Mathieu; Aurélie Chantôme; Florence Lefranc; Alessio Cimmino; Walter Miklos; Verena Paulitschke; Thomas Mohr; Lucia Maddau; Alexander Kornienko; Walter Berger; Christophe Vandier; Antonio Evidente; Eric Delpire; Robert Kiss Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 9.261
Authors: Kanaka Sai Ram Padam; Richard Morgan; Keith Hunter; Sanjiban Chakrabarty; Naveena A N Kumar; Raghu Radhakrishnan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Maria Adriana Neag; Dana Maria Muntean; Alexandra Nacu; Adrian Catinean; Anca Farcas; Stefan Vesa; Corina Bocsan; Laurian Vlase; Anca Dana Buzoianu Journal: Med Pharm Rep Date: 2019-04-25