Literature DB >> 16555597

Onset but not offset of irrelevant motion disrupts inhibition of return.

Richard A Abrams1, Shawn E Christ.   

Abstract

In seven experiments, subjects were slower to detect targets in cued static objects than in uncued static objects, revealing inhibition of return (IOR). This occurred regardless of the presence or absence of continuous motion of other, task-irrelevant objects in the display. However, if the motion of the irrelevant objects began during the interval between cue and target, the amount of IOR was considerably reduced. Offset of motion during the cue-target interval had no effect. Implications for IOR, object perception, and attentional capture are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16555597     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  4 in total

1.  Prior information and oculomotor initiation: the effect of cues in gaps.

Authors:  Paul C Knox
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motion onset does not capture attention when subsequent motion is "smooth".

Authors:  Meera Mary Sunny; Adrian von Mühlenen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

3.  Motion disrupts dynamic visual search for an orientation change.

Authors:  Emily M Crowe; Christina J Howard; Iain D Gilchrist; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-06-26

4.  The Effect of Ratio of Changing to Static Stimuli on the Attentional Capture.

Authors:  Fuminori Ono
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.