Literature DB >> 16554579

Comparison of mangafodipir trisodium- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI for detection and characterization of hepatic metastases in colorectal cancer patients.

Hyoung Jung Kim1, Kyoung Won Kim, Jae Ho Byun, Hyung Jin Won, Yong Moon Shin, Pyo Nyun Kim, Moo-Song Lee, Moon-Gyu Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the validity of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced versus ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI in the detection and characterization of hepatic lesions in colorectal cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients who were known to have or suspected of having hepatic metastasis from colorectal carcinoma underwent mangafodipir trisodium- or ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI in block randomization methods. Two radiologists independently reviewed the MR images to determine the number of hepatic lesions and to characterize the lesions as malignant or benign. Each lesion was assessed according to its size (small, <or= 2 cm; large, > 2 cm in diameter) on both mangafodipir trisodium- or ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI. The data were correlated with the reference diagnosis: histopathology and intraoperative sonography (n = 16); intraoperative sonography (n = 4); and imaging and clinical diagnosis with follow-up (> 3 months; n = 21). The detection rates and diagnostic accuracies of hepatic lesions on both sets of MR images were assessed using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Eighty-two hepatic lesions (53 metastatic and 29 benign) were identified in 41 patients. No significant differences were seen between mangafodipir trisodium- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI for detecting all hepatic lesions (p = 0.183), small hepatic lesions (p = 0.299), all metastases (p = 0.695), and small metastases (p = 0.689). The diagnostic accuracies of mangafodipir trisodium- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI showed no significant differences in all hepatic lesions (p = 0.624) and small hepatic lesions (p = 0.641).
CONCLUSION: Mangafodipir trisodium- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI are similar in hepatic lesion detection and characterization in colorectal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16554579     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma following chemotherapy: SPIO-MRI versus FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  L Bacigalupo; S Aufort; M C Eberlé; E Assenat; M Ychou; B Gallix
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Enabling individualized therapy through nanotechnology.

Authors:  Jason H Sakamoto; Anne L van de Ven; Biana Godin; Elvin Blanco; Rita E Serda; Alessandro Grattoni; Arturas Ziemys; Ali Bouamrani; Tony Hu; Shivakumar I Ranganathan; Enrica De Rosa; Jonathan O Martinez; Christine A Smid; Rachel M Buchanan; Sei-Young Lee; Srimeenakshi Srinivasan; Matthew Landry; Anne Meyn; Ennio Tasciotti; Xuewu Liu; Paolo Decuzzi; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 7.658

3.  Pretreatment assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma: expert consensus statement.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Elijah Dixon; Eddie K Abdalla; W Scott Helton; Timothy M Pawlik; Bachir Taouli; Antoine Brouquet; Reid B Adams
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Liver metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Vito Cantisani; Hektor Grazhdani; Cristina Fioravanti; Maria Rosignuolo; Fabrizio Calliada; Daniela Messineo; Maria Giulia Bernieri; Adriano Redler; Carlo Catalano; Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Manganese-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  D J Suto; G Nair; D M Sudarshana; S U Steele; J Dwyer; E S Beck; J Ohayon; H McFarland; A P Koretsky; I C M Cortese; D S Reich
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Small liver lesions in oncologic patients: characterization with CT, MRI and contrast-enhanced US.

Authors:  Giovanni Morana; Christian Cugini; Raffaella Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Non-invasive detection of biliary leaks using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography: comparison with T2-weighted MR cholangiography.

Authors:  Mecit Kantarcı; Berhan Pirimoglu; Nevzat Karabulut; Ummugulsum Bayraktutan; Hayri Ogul; Gurkan Ozturk; Bulent Aydinli; Yesim Kizrak; Suat Eren; Sinan Yilmaz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Description of focal liver lesions with Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Cosmin-Nicolae Caraiani; Marian Dan; Diana-Ioana Fenesan; Radu Badea
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2015-11-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.