Literature DB >> 16554092

Cell-attached voltage-clamp and current-clamp recording and stimulation techniques in brain slices.

Katherine L Perkins1.   

Abstract

Cell-attached recording provides a way to record the activity of - and to stimulate - neurons in brain slices without rupturing the cell membrane. This review uses theory and experimental data to address the proper application of this technique and the correct interpretation of the data. Voltage-clamp mode is best-suited for recording cell firing activity, and current-clamp mode is best-suited for recording resting membrane potential and synaptic potentials. The magnitude of the seal resistance determines what types of experiments can be accomplished with a cell-attached recording: a loose seal is adequate for recording action potential currents, and a tight seal is required for evoking action potentials in the attached cell and for recording resting and synaptic potentials. When recording action potential currents, if the researcher does not want to change the firing activity of the cell, then it is important that no current passes from the amplifier through the patch resistance. In order to accomplish this condition, the recording pipette should be held at the potential that gives a holding current of 0. An advantage of cell-attached current-clamp over whole-cell recording is that it accurately depicts whether a synaptic potential is hyperpolarizing or depolarizing without the risk of changing its polarity.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16554092      PMCID: PMC2373773          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  20 in total

1.  Combining loose cell-attached stimulation and recording.

Authors:  B Barbour; P Isope
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Olfactory bulb glomeruli: external tufted cells intrinsically burst at theta frequency and are entrained by patterned olfactory input.

Authors:  Abdallah Hayar; Sergei Karnup; Michael T Shipley; Matthew Ennis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Membrane potential of CA3 hippocampal pyramidal cells during postnatal development.

Authors:  Roman Tyzio; Anton Ivanov; Cristophe Bernard; Gregory L Holmes; Yehezkiel Ben-Ari; Roustem Khazipov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Mechanisms of fast ripples in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Volodymyr I Dzhala; Kevin J Staley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Liquid junction potentials and small cell effects in patch-clamp analysis.

Authors:  P H Barry; J W Lynch
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Whole cell recording from neurons in slices of reptilian and mammalian cerebral cortex.

Authors:  M G Blanton; J J Lo Turco; A R Kriegstein
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Alpha-adrenoceptive dual modulation of inhibitory GABAergic inputs to Purkinje cells in the mouse cerebellum.

Authors:  Moritoshi Hirono; Kunihiko Obata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A patch-clamp study of bovine chromaffin cells and of their sensitivity to acetylcholine.

Authors:  E M Fenwick; A Marty; E Neher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Excitatory synaptic responses mediated by GABAA receptors in the hippocampus.

Authors:  H B Michelson; R K Wong
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Muscarinic activation of ionic currents measured by a new whole-cell recording method.

Authors:  R Horn; A Marty
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  118 in total

1.  Effects of axonal topology on the somatic modulation of synaptic outputs.

Authors:  Takuya Sasaki; Norio Matsuki; Yuji Ikegaya
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Measuring the firing rate of high-resistance neurons with cell-attached recording.

Authors:  Pepe Alcami; Romain Franconville; Isabel Llano; Alain Marty
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  SK channels modulate the excitability and firing precision of projection neurons in the robust nucleus of the arcopallium in adult male zebra finches.

Authors:  Guo-Qiang Hou; Xuan Pan; Cong-Shu Liao; Song-Hua Wang; Dong-Feng Li
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  Targeted axon-attached recording with fluorescent patch-clamp pipettes in brain slices.

Authors:  Takuya Sasaki; Norio Matsuki; Yuji Ikegaya
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Molecular layer inhibitory interneurons provide feedforward and lateral inhibition in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Michael T Roberts; Laurence O Trussell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Plasticity of spontaneous excitatory and inhibitory synaptic activity in morphologically defined vestibular nuclei neurons during early vestibular compensation.

Authors:  Mei Shao; June C Hirsch; Kenna D Peusner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A stress steroid triggers anxiety via increased expression of α4βδ GABAA receptors in methamphetamine dependence.

Authors:  H Shen; A Mohammad; J Ramroop; S S Smith
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Activation of neuropeptide S-expressing neurons in the locus coeruleus by corticotropin-releasing factor.

Authors:  Kay Jüngling; Xiaobin Liu; Jörg Lesting; Philippe Coulon; L Sosulina; Rainer K Reinscheid; Hans-Christian Pape
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Single-cell juxtacellular transfection and recording technique.

Authors:  Julia Daniel; Hans Reiner Polder; Volkmar Lessmann; Tanja Brigadski
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 3.657

10.  Dopamine neuron responses depend exponentially on pacemaker interval.

Authors:  Ilva Putzier; Paul H M Kullmann; John P Horn; Edwin S Levitan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.