V Wiseman1, B McElroy, L Conteh, W Stevens. 1. Gates Malaria Partnership, Gates Malaria Partnership and Health Policy Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. virginia.wiseman@lshtm.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide a better understanding of (1) the amounts households in The Gambia spend on a wide variety of malaria prevention measures, (2) how expenditure fluctuates throughout the year and (3) the main determinants of expenditure. METHODS: A random sample of 1700 households from the Farafenni region were interviewed about their expenditure on malaria prevention over the past 2 weeks. Interviews were staggered over 12 months. Expenditure was measured for bed nets, treating and repairing bed nets, aerosols, coils, indoor spraying, smoke and other prevention strategies such as drinking herbs and cleaning the outside environment. Results Expenditure on bed nets, including treatment and repair, constituted only 10% of total expenditure on malaria prevention. Every fortnight, households spent an average of 8.40 Dalasis (D) on coils, 4.20 D on indoor sprays, 3.09 D on smoke and 3.06 D on aerosols, together making up 81% of total fortnightly expenditure. Of the 442 households that did not own a bed net, 68% said it was because they could not afford one. Every 2 months, the same households spent an average of US 5 dollars, the equivalent to the cost of an insecticide treated bed net, on other forms of prevention. Total expenditure was 42% higher during the wet season than for the rest of the year. For every month of the year, coils were the dominant form of prevention expenditure. Wealth, age, occupation of household head, location of residence and month of the year were significant determinants of prevention expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Households in The Gambia spend considerable amounts on a range of malaria prevention products and activities throughout the year. Bed nets represent a relatively small proportion of this expenditure even though they are perceived to be the most efficient and effective method of malaria control. A more concerted effort is needed to develop appropriate targeting strategies to encourage bed net use especially for children <5 years of age. Equal emphasis should be given to addressing barriers to purchasing nets such as their relative high upfront cost.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a better understanding of (1) the amounts households in The Gambia spend on a wide variety of malaria prevention measures, (2) how expenditure fluctuates throughout the year and (3) the main determinants of expenditure. METHODS: A random sample of 1700 households from the Farafenni region were interviewed about their expenditure on malaria prevention over the past 2 weeks. Interviews were staggered over 12 months. Expenditure was measured for bed nets, treating and repairing bed nets, aerosols, coils, indoor spraying, smoke and other prevention strategies such as drinking herbs and cleaning the outside environment. Results Expenditure on bed nets, including treatment and repair, constituted only 10% of total expenditure on malaria prevention. Every fortnight, households spent an average of 8.40 Dalasis (D) on coils, 4.20 D on indoor sprays, 3.09 D on smoke and 3.06 D on aerosols, together making up 81% of total fortnightly expenditure. Of the 442 households that did not own a bed net, 68% said it was because they could not afford one. Every 2 months, the same households spent an average of US 5 dollars, the equivalent to the cost of an insecticide treated bed net, on other forms of prevention. Total expenditure was 42% higher during the wet season than for the rest of the year. For every month of the year, coils were the dominant form of prevention expenditure. Wealth, age, occupation of household head, location of residence and month of the year were significant determinants of prevention expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Households in The Gambia spend considerable amounts on a range of malaria prevention products and activities throughout the year. Bed nets represent a relatively small proportion of this expenditure even though they are perceived to be the most efficient and effective method of malaria control. A more concerted effort is needed to develop appropriate targeting strategies to encourage bed net use especially for children <5 years of age. Equal emphasis should be given to addressing barriers to purchasing nets such as their relative high upfront cost.
Authors: Lesong Conteh; Edith Patouillard; Margaret Kweku; Rosa Legood; Brian Greenwood; Daniel Chandramohan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah O'Neill; Charlotte Gryseels; Susan Dierickx; Julia Mwesigwa; Joseph Okebe; Umberto d'Alessandro; Koen Peeters Grietens Journal: Malar J Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Anna M Stewart Ibarra; Valerie A Luzadis; Mercy J Borbor Cordova; Mercy Silva; Tania Ordoñez; Efraín Beltrán Ayala; Sadie J Ryan Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 3.295