OBJECTIVE: To introduce the pathophysiological Tulip classification system for underlying cause and mechanism of perinatal mortality based on clinical and pathological findings for the purpose of counselling and prevention. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: Tertiary referral teaching hospital. POPULATION: Perinatally related deaths. METHODS: A classification consisting of groups of cause and mechanism of death was drawn up by a panel through the causal analysis of the events related to death. Individual classification of cause and mechanism was performed by assessors. Panel discussions were held for cases without consensus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater agreement for cause and mechanism of death. RESULTS: The classification consists of six main causes with subclassifications: (1) congenital anomaly (chromosomal, syndrome and single- or multiple-organ system), (2) placenta (placental bed, placental pathology, umbilical cord complication and not otherwise specified [NOS]), (3) prematurity (preterm prelabour rupture of membranes, preterm labour, cervical dysfunction, iatrogenous and NOS), (4) infection (transplacental, ascending, neonatal and NOS), (5) other (fetal hydrops of unknown origin, maternal disease, trauma and out of the ordinary) and (6) unknown. Overall kappa coefficient for agreement for cause was 0.81 (95% CI 0.80-0.83). Six mechanisms were drawn up: cardio/circulatory insufficiency, multi-organ failure, respiratory insufficiency, cerebral insufficiency, placental insufficiency and unknown. Overall kappa for mechanism was 0.72 (95% CI 0.70-0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Classifying perinatal mortality to compare performance over time and between centres is useful and necessary. Interpretation of classifications demands consistency. The Tulip classification allows unambiguous classification of underlying cause and mechanism of perinatal mortality, gives a good inter-rater agreement, with a low percentage of unknown causes, and is easily applicable in a team of clinicians when guidelines are followed.
OBJECTIVE: To introduce the pathophysiological Tulip classification system for underlying cause and mechanism of perinatal mortality based on clinical and pathological findings for the purpose of counselling and prevention. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: Tertiary referral teaching hospital. POPULATION: Perinatally related deaths. METHODS: A classification consisting of groups of cause and mechanism of death was drawn up by a panel through the causal analysis of the events related to death. Individual classification of cause and mechanism was performed by assessors. Panel discussions were held for cases without consensus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater agreement for cause and mechanism of death. RESULTS: The classification consists of six main causes with subclassifications: (1) congenital anomaly (chromosomal, syndrome and single- or multiple-organ system), (2) placenta (placental bed, placental pathology, umbilical cord complication and not otherwise specified [NOS]), (3) prematurity (preterm prelabour rupture of membranes, preterm labour, cervical dysfunction, iatrogenous and NOS), (4) infection (transplacental, ascending, neonatal and NOS), (5) other (fetal hydrops of unknown origin, maternal disease, trauma and out of the ordinary) and (6) unknown. Overall kappa coefficient for agreement for cause was 0.81 (95% CI 0.80-0.83). Six mechanisms were drawn up: cardio/circulatory insufficiency, multi-organ failure, respiratory insufficiency, cerebral insufficiency, placental insufficiency and unknown. Overall kappa for mechanism was 0.72 (95% CI 0.70-0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Classifying perinatal mortality to compare performance over time and between centres is useful and necessary. Interpretation of classifications demands consistency. The Tulip classification allows unambiguous classification of underlying cause and mechanism of perinatal mortality, gives a good inter-rater agreement, with a low percentage of unknown causes, and is easily applicable in a team of clinicians when guidelines are followed.
Authors: Roberto Romero; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Offer Erez; Adi L Tarca; Maria Teresa Gervasi; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Pooja Mittal; Giovanna Ogge; Edi Vaisbuch; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Zhong Dong; Sun Kwon Kim; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2010-05-12
Authors: Theonia K Boyd; Colleen Anne Wright; Hein Odendaal; Amy J Elliott; Mary Ann Sens; Rebecca Dunn Folkerth; Drucilla J Roberts; Hannah Kinney Journal: Pediatr Dev Pathol Date: 2016-04-26
Authors: Philip S Hall; Gregory Nah; Eric Vittinghoff; Donna R Parker; JoAnn E Manson; Barbara V Howard; Gloria E Sarto; Margery L Gass; Shawnita M Sealy-Jefferson; Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher; Marcia L Stefanick; Aladdin H Shadyab; Linda V Van Horn; Ki Park; Nisha I Parikh Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Joy E Lawn; Michael G Gravett; Toni M Nunes; Craig E Rubens; Cynthia Stanton Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: J Frederik Frøen; Halit Pinar; Vicki Flenady; Safiah Bahrin; Adrian Charles; Lawrence Chauke; Katie Day; Charles W Duke; Fabio Facchinetti; Ruth C Fretts; Glenn Gardener; Kristen Gilshenan; Sanne J Gordijn; Adrienne Gordon; Grace Guyon; Catherine Harrison; Rachel Koshy; Robert C Pattinson; Karin Petersson; Laurie Russell; Eli Saastad; Gordon C S Smith; Rozbeh Torabi Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2009-06-10 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: J Frederik Frøen; Sanne J Gordijn; Hany Abdel-Aleem; Per Bergsjø; Ana Betran; Charles W Duke; Vincent Fauveau; Vicki Flenady; Sven Gudmund Hinderaker; G Justus Hofmeyr; Abdul Hakeem Jokhio; Joy Lawn; Pisake Lumbiganon; Mario Merialdi; Robert Pattinson; Anuraj Shankar Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 3.007