Literature DB >> 16553553

Infectious bursal disease virus: strains that differ in virulence differentially modulate the innate immune response to infection in the chicken bursa.

Ibrahim Eldaghayes1, Lisa Rothwell, Andrew Williams, David Withers, Sucharitha Balu, Fred Davison, Pete Kaiser.   

Abstract

Little is understood about the immune responses involved in the pathogenesis of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Strains of IBDV differ in their virulence: F52/70 is a classical virulent strain (vIBDV), whereas UK661 is a very virulent strain (vvIBDV) that causes greater pathology and earlier mortality. The exact causes of clinical disease and death are still unclear. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1beta and IL-6, produced by activated macrophages, could play a role, as could cytokines produced by T and natural killer (NK) cells, such as interferon (IFN)-gamma, which stimulate macrophages. We quantified mRNA transcription in bursal tissue, by real-time quantitative reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), for the type I IFN (IFN-alpha and IFN-beta), pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-6, and CXCLi2), the anti-inflammatory cytokine transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta4, and Th1 cytokines (IFN-gamma, IL-2 [and the closely related IL-15], IL-12, and IL-18) for the first 5 days after infection of 3-week-old chickens with F52/70 or UK661 and compared these with levels in bursal tissue from uninfected age-matched controls. Both strains induced a pro-inflammatory response, evidenced by increased mRNA transcription of IL-1beta, IL-6, and CXCLi2, and down-regulation of TGF-beta4, of similar magnitude and timing. IFN-gamma mRNA was induced by both strains, although to a greater degree by the vvIBDV strain, indicating that a cell-mediated response is induced. Neither virus initially induced high levels of type I IFN. F52/70 seems to use a "stealth" approach by not inducing the type I IFNs, whereas UK661 down-regulates their expression. This suggests that both viruses modulate the host immune response, although probably by using different mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16553553     DOI: 10.1089/vim.2006.19.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Viral Immunol        ISSN: 0882-8245            Impact factor:   2.257


  38 in total

1.  Fas/FasL and perforin-granzyme pathways mediated T cell cytotoxic responses in infectious bursal disease virus infected chickens.

Authors:  Abdul Rauf; Mahesh Khatri; Maria V Murgia; Yehia M Saif
Journal:  Results Immunol       Date:  2012-05-16

2.  Chicken mannose-binding lectin (MBL) gene variants with influence on MBL serum concentrations.

Authors:  Rikke M Kjærup; Liselotte R Norup; Karsten Skjødt; Tina S Dalgaard; Helle R Juul-Madsen
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 2.846

3.  Generation and characterization of chicken bone marrow-derived dendritic cells.

Authors:  Zhiguang Wu; Lisa Rothwell; John R Young; Jim Kaufman; Colin Butter; Pete Kaiser
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Apoptotic response of chicken embryonic fibroblast cells to infectious bursal disease virus infections reflects viral pathogenicity.

Authors:  Shahla Shahsavandi; Mohammad Majid Ebrahimi; Kaveh Sadeghi; Homayoon Mahravani
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.416

5.  Inhibition of antiviral innate immunity by birnavirus VP3 protein via blockage of viral double-stranded RNA binding to the host cytoplasmic RNA detector MDA5.

Authors:  Chengjin Ye; Lu Jia; Yanting Sun; Boli Hu; Lun Wang; Xingmeng Lu; Jiyong Zhou
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Changes in the Cytokine and Toll-Like Receptor Gene Expression Following Infection of Indigenous and Commercial Chickens With Infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  G Dhinakar Raj; T M Chozhavel Rajanathan; K Kumanan; S Elankumaran
Journal:  Indian J Virol       Date:  2011-09-06

7.  Differential modulation of cytokine, chemokine and Toll like receptor expression in chickens infected with classical and variant infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  Abdul Rauf; Mahesh Khatri; Maria V Murgia; Kwonil Jung; Yehia M Saif
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Comparison of the expression of cytokine genes in the bursal tissues of the chickens following challenge with infectious bursal disease viruses of varying virulence.

Authors:  Haiwen Liu; Manfu Zhang; Haitang Han; Jihong Yuan; Zandong Li
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.099

9.  Genotype-dependent tumor regression in Marek's disease mediated at the level of tumor immunity.

Authors:  Shyamesh Kumar; Joram J Buza; Shane C Burgess
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2009-03-18

10.  Gingyo-san enhances immunity and potentiates infectious bursal disease vaccination.

Authors:  Che-Ming Hung; Chia-Chou Yeh; Kowit-Yu Chong; Hsiao-Ling Chen; Jiun-Yu Chen; Shung-Te Kao; Chih-Ching Yen; Ming-Hsien Yeh; Maw-Sun Lin; Chuan-Mu Chen
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.