Literature DB >> 16552225

Cost drivers in anesthesia: manpower, technique and other factors.

Martin Schuster1, Thomas Standl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the recent literature on cost drivers in anesthesia with respect to staff, techniques and drug costs, and with special focus on anesthesia workflow in the postanesthesia care unit. Moreover, the costs of post-operative pain management provided by an acute pain service are highlighted. RECENT
FINDINGS: Staff costs represent the main contributor to anesthesia costs in all studies. Therefore, many studies address the reduction of personnel costs, e.g. by using fast-tracking procedures which allow the patients to bypass the postanesthesia care unit. However, postanesthesia care unit bypassing and replacement of anesthesiologists by certified anesthesia nurses were not able to significantly decrease anesthesia costs. If anesthesiologists are reimbursed by surgically controlled time, this time is the main determinator for anesthesia costs and should be carefully monitored. Regional anesthesia techniques can help to reduce costs in the ambulatory setting because of reduced post-operative side-effects and earlier home readiness of the patients. Low gas flow and modern electroencephalographic monitoring can contribute to decreased drug-related costs. Acute pain services are mainly run by anesthesia staff thus increasing the costs in anesthesia departments. However, an acute pain service can reduce costs of surgical procedures significantly.
SUMMARY: Clear definition of the meaning of cost drivers and of criteria which allow assessment of patients' condition, and peri-operative standard operating procedures are warranted to ensure comparability of economic data in anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16552225     DOI: 10.1097/01.aco.0000192790.78139.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.706


  9 in total

Review 1.  Regional anaesthesia with sedation protocol to safely debride sacral pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Daniel K O'Neill; Bryan Robins; Elizabeth A Ayello; Germaine Cuff; Patrick Linton; Harold Brem
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  [Workflow management in the operating room. Analysis of potentials for optimizing efficiency at a university hospital].

Authors:  A Welker; B Wolcke; A Schleppers; S B Schmeck; U Focke; H W Gervais; J Schmeck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  [The value of regional and general anaesthesia in orthopaedic surgery].

Authors:  O Vicent; M Hübler; S Kirschner; T Koch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Value based care and bundled payments: Anesthesia care costs for outpatient oncology surgery using time-driven activity-based costing.

Authors:  Katy E French; Alexis B Guzman; Augustin C Rubio; John C Frenzel; Thomas W Feeley
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2015-09-04

5.  Feasibility of in-office endoscopic sinus surgery with balloon sinus dilation.

Authors:  Ford D Albritton; Roy R Casiano; Michael J Sillers
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.467

Review 6.  Regional anesthesia at home.

Authors:  Gloria S Cheng; Lynna P Choy; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 7.  The evolution and practice of acute pain medicine.

Authors:  Justin Upp; Michael Kent; Patrick J Tighe
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.750

8.  Cost analysis of two anaesthetic machines: "Primus®" and "Zeus®".

Authors:  Jose Hinz; Nadine Rieske; Bernd Schwien; Aron F Popov; Prashant N Mohite; Oliver Radke; Armin Bartsch; Michael Quintel; Klaus Züchner
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-01-04

9.  The effectiveness of an oral opioid rescue medication algorithm for postoperative pain management compared to PCIA : A cohort analysis.

Authors:  J Erlenwein; M I Emons; F Petzke; M Quintel; I Staboulidou; M Przemeck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.041

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.