PURPOSE: These studies were designed to determine whether ritonavir inhibits breast cancer in vitro and in vivo and, if so, how. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Ritonavir effects on breast cancer cell growth were studied in the estrogen receptor (ER)-positive lines MCF7 and T47D and in the ER-negative lines MDA-MB-436 and MDA-MB-231. Effects of ritonavir on Rb-regulated and Akt-mediated cell proliferation were studied. Ritonavir was tested for inhibition of a mammary carcinoma xenograft. RESULTS: ER-positive estradiol-dependent lines (IC50, 12-24 micromol/L) and ER-negative (IC50, 45 micromol/L) lines exhibit ritonavir sensitivity. Ritonavir depletes ER-alpha levels notably in ER-positive lines. Ritonavir causes G1 arrest, depletes cyclin-dependent kinases 2, 4, and 6 and cyclin D1 but not cyclin E, and depletes phosphorylated Rb and Ser473 Akt. Ritonavir induces apoptosis independent of G1 arrest, inhibiting growth of cells that have passed the G1 checkpoint. Myristoyl-Akt, but not activated K-Ras, rescues ritonavir inhibition. Ritonavir inhibited a MDA-MB-231 xenograft and intratumoral Akt activity at a clinically attainable serum Cmax of 22 +/- 8 micromol/L. Because heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) substrates are depleted by ritonavir, ritonavir effects on Hsp90 were tested. Ritonavir binds Hsp90 (K(D), 7.8 micromol/L) and partially inhibits its chaperone function. Ritonavir blocks association of Hsp90 with Akt and, with sustained exposure, notably depletes Hsp90. Stably expressed Hsp90alpha short hairpin RNA also depletes Hsp90, inhibiting proliferation and sensitizing breast cancer cells to low ritonavir concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Ritonavir inhibits breast cancer growth in part by inhibiting Hsp90 substrates, including Akt. Ritonavir may be of interest for breast cancer therapeutics and its efficacy may be increased by sustained exposure or Hsp90 RNA interference.
PURPOSE: These studies were designed to determine whether ritonavir inhibits breast cancer in vitro and in vivo and, if so, how. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Ritonavir effects on breast cancer cell growth were studied in the estrogen receptor (ER)-positive lines MCF7 and T47D and in the ER-negative lines MDA-MB-436 and MDA-MB-231. Effects of ritonavir on Rb-regulated and Akt-mediated cell proliferation were studied. Ritonavir was tested for inhibition of a mammary carcinoma xenograft. RESULTS: ER-positive estradiol-dependent lines (IC50, 12-24 micromol/L) and ER-negative (IC50, 45 micromol/L) lines exhibit ritonavir sensitivity. Ritonavir depletes ER-alpha levels notably in ER-positive lines. Ritonavir causes G1 arrest, depletes cyclin-dependent kinases 2, 4, and 6 and cyclin D1 but not cyclin E, and depletes phosphorylated Rb and Ser473 Akt. Ritonavir induces apoptosis independent of G1 arrest, inhibiting growth of cells that have passed the G1 checkpoint. Myristoyl-Akt, but not activated K-Ras, rescues ritonavir inhibition. Ritonavir inhibited a MDA-MB-231 xenograft and intratumoral Akt activity at a clinically attainable serum Cmax of 22 +/- 8 micromol/L. Because heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) substrates are depleted by ritonavir, ritonavir effects on Hsp90 were tested. Ritonavir binds Hsp90 (K(D), 7.8 micromol/L) and partially inhibits its chaperone function. Ritonavir blocks association of Hsp90 with Akt and, with sustained exposure, notably depletes Hsp90. Stably expressed Hsp90alpha short hairpin RNA also depletes Hsp90, inhibiting proliferation and sensitizing breast cancer cells to low ritonavir concentrations. CONCLUSIONS:Ritonavir inhibits breast cancer growth in part by inhibiting Hsp90 substrates, including Akt. Ritonavir may be of interest for breast cancer therapeutics and its efficacy may be increased by sustained exposure or Hsp90 RNA interference.
Authors: G Gatti; A Di Biagio; R Casazza; C De Pascalis; M Bassetti; M Cruciani; S Vella; D Bassetti Journal: AIDS Date: 1999-10-22 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Takayuki Ikezoe; Yasuko Hisatake; Tamotsu Takeuchi; Yuji Ohtsuki; Yang Yang; Jonathan W Said; Hirokuni Taguchi; H Phillip Koeffler Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Michael W-H Wang; Shi Wei; Roberta Faccio; Sunao Takeshita; Pablo Tebas; William G Powderly; Steven L Teitelbaum; F Patrick Ross Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Anjaiah Srirangam; Monica Milani; Ranjana Mitra; Zhijun Guo; Mariangellys Rodriguez; Hitesh Kathuria; Seiji Fukuda; Anthony Rizzardi; Stephen Schmechel; David G Skalnik; Louis M Pelus; David A Potter Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Zhijun Guo; Irina F Sevrioukova; Ilia G Denisov; Xia Zhang; Ting-Lan Chiu; Dafydd G Thomas; Eric A Hanse; Rebecca A D Cuellar; Yelena V Grinkova; Vanessa Wankhede Langenfeld; Daniel S Swedien; Justin D Stamschror; Juan Alvarez; Fernando Luna; Adela Galván; Young Kyung Bae; Julia D Wulfkuhle; Rosa I Gallagher; Emanuel F Petricoin; Beverly Norris; Craig M Flory; Robert J Schumacher; M Gerard O'Sullivan; Qing Cao; Haitao Chu; John D Lipscomb; William M Atkins; Kalpna Gupta; Ameeta Kelekar; Ian A Blair; Jorge H Capdevila; John R Falck; Stephen G Sligar; Thomas L Poulos; Gunda I Georg; Elizabeth Ambrose; David A Potter Journal: Cell Chem Biol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 8.116
Authors: Sanjeev Kumar; Christopher S Bryant; Sreedhar Chamala; Aamer Qazi; Shelly Seward; Jagannath Pal; Christopher P Steffes; Donald W Weaver; Robert Morris; John M Malone; Masood A Shammas; Madhu Prasad; Ramesh B Batchu Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 27.401