Literature DB >> 16551779

A highly sensitive ELISA D-dimer increases testing but not diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Christopher Kabrhel1, Christina Matts, Mariah McNamara, Jeremy Katz, Thomas Ptak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of introducing a rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) D-dimer on the percentage of emergency department (ED) patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism (PE), the use of associated laboratory testing, pulmonary vascular imaging, and the diagnoses of PE.
METHODS: Patients evaluated for PE during three 120-day periods were enrolled: immediately before (period 1), immediately after (period 2), and one year after the introduction of a rapid ELISA D-dimer in the hospital. The frequency of ED patients evaluated for PE with any test, with D-dimer testing, and with pulmonary vascular imaging and the frequency of PE diagnosis during each time period were determined.
RESULTS: The percentage of patients evaluated for PE nearly doubled; from 1.36% (328/24,101) in period 1 to 2.58% (654/25,318) in period 2 and 2.42% (583/24,093) in period 3. The percentage of patients who underwent D-dimer testing increased more than fourfold; from 0.39% (93/24,101) in period 1 to 1.83% (464/25,318) in period 2 and 1.77% (427/24,093) in period 3. The percentage of patients who underwent pulmonary vascular imaging increased from 1.02% (247/24,101) in period 1 to 1.36% (344/25,318) in period 2 and to 1.39% (334/24,093) in period 3. There was no difference in the percentage of patients diagnosed as having PE in period 1 (0.20% [47/24,101]), period 2 (0.27% [69/25,318]), and period 3 (0.24% [58/24,093]).
CONCLUSIONS: In the study's academic ED, introduction of ELISA D-dimer testing was accompanied by an increase in PE evaluations, D-dimer testing, and pulmonary vascular imaging; there was no observed change in the rate of PE diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16551779     DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department and consistency with a national quality measure: quantifying the opportunity for improvement.

Authors:  Arjun K Venkatesh; Jeffrey A Kline; D Mark Courtney; Carlos A Camargo; Michael C Plewa; Kristen E Nordenholz; Christopher L Moore; Peter B Richman; Howard A Smithline; Daren M Beam; Christopher Kabrhel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-09

2.  Factors associated with positive D-dimer results in patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Christopher Kabrhel; D Mark Courtney; Carlos A Camargo; Michael C Plewa; Kristen E Nordenholz; Christopher L Moore; Peter B Richman; Howard A Smithline; Daren M Beam; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 3.  D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Fay Crawford; Alina Andras; Karen Welch; Karen Sheares; David Keeling; Francesca M Chappell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-05

4.  Serial use of existing clinical decisions aids can reduce computed tomography pulmonary angiography for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Robert Russell Ehrman; Adrienne Nicole Malik; Reid Kenneth Smith; Zeid Kalarikkal; Andrew Huang; Ryan Michael King; Rubin David Green; Brian James O'Neil; Robert Leigh Sherwin
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Cost-effectiveness of strategies for diagnosing pulmonary embolism among emergency department patients presenting with undifferentiated symptoms.

Authors:  Ram S Duriseti; Margaret L Brandeau
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Prospective diagnostic accuracy assessment of the HemosIL HS D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients.

Authors:  D Mark Courtney; Justin M Steinberg; Jennifer C McCormick
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.944

7.  Clinical features from the history and physical examination that predict the presence or absence of pulmonary embolism in symptomatic emergency department patients: results of a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  D Mark Courtney; Jeffrey A Kline; Christopher Kabrhel; Christopher L Moore; Howard A Smithline; Kristen E Nordenholz; Peter B Richman; Michael C Plewa
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 8.  Screening, evaluation, and early management of acute aortic dissection in the ED.

Authors:  Reuben J Strayer; Peter L Shearer; Luke K Hermann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-05

9.  Unsuspected pulmonary embolism in observation unit patients.

Authors:  Alexander T Limkakeng; Seth W Glickman; Charles B Cairns; Abhinav Chandra
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-08

10.  Shifting up cutoff value of d-dimer in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism: a viable option? Possible risks and benefits.

Authors:  Bennidor Raviv; Shlomo H Israelit
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 1.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.