Literature DB >> 16551526

Ultrasound-based guidance of intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Albert Y C Fung1, Komanduri M Ayyangar, David Djajaputra, Ramasamy M Nehru, Charles A Enke.   

Abstract

In ultrasound-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of prostate cancer, ultrasound imaging ascertains the anatomical position of patients during x-ray therapy delivery. The ultrasound transducers are made of piezoelectric ceramics. The same crystal is used for both ultrasound production and reception. Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound devices capture and correlate series of 2-dimensional (2D) B-mode images. The transducers are often arranged in a convex array for focusing. Lower frequency reaches greater depth, but results in low resolution. For clear image, some gel is usually applied between the probe and the skin contact surface. For prostate positioning, axial and sagittal scans are performed, and the volume contours from computed tomography (CT) planning are superimposed on the ultrasound images obtained before radiation delivery at the linear accelerator. The planning volumes are then overlaid on the ultrasound images and adjusted until they match. The computer automatically deduces the offset necessary to move the patient so that the treatment area is in the correct location. The couch is translated as needed. The currently available commercial equipment can attain a positional accuracy of 1-2 mm. Commercial manufacturer designs differ in the detection of probe coordinates relative to the isocenter. Some use a position-sensing robotic arm, while others have infrared light-emitting diodes or pattern-recognition software with charge-couple-device cameras. Commissioning includes testing of image quality and positional accuracy. Ultrasound is mainly used in prostate positioning. Data for 7825 daily fractions of 234 prostate patients indicated average 3D inter-fractional displacement of about 7.8 mm. There was no perceivable trend of shift over time. Scatter plots showed slight prevalence toward superior-posterior directions. Uncertainties of ultrasound guidance included tissue inhomogeneities, speckle noise, probe pressure, and inter-observer variation. Some published studies detected improvement in treatment based on gastrointestinal toxicity and the reduction of prostate movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16551526     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2005.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  9 in total

1.  [Image-guided radiation therapy].

Authors:  J Boda-Heggemann; M Guckenberger; U Ganswindt; C Belka; H Wertz; M Blessing; F Wenz; M Fuss; F Lohr
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Intrafractional motion of the prostate during hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yaoqin Xie; David Djajaputra; Christopher R King; Sabbir Hossain; Lijun Ma; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Monte Carlo investigations of the effect of beam divergence on thick, segmented crystalline scintillators for radiotherapy imaging.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Youcef El-Mohri; Larry E Antonuk; Qihua Zhao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Toward the development of intrafraction tumor deformation tracking using a dynamic multi-leaf collimator.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Ge; Ricky T O'Brien; Chun-Chien Shieh; Jeremy T Booth; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Comparison of daily couch shifts using MVCT (TomoTherapy) and B-mode ultrasound (BAT System) during prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Steven H Lin; Elizabeth Sugar; Terrance Teslow; Todd McNutt; Habeeb Saleh; Danny Y Song
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-08

6.  Intraprostatic fiducial markers: a potential application for ultrasound-guided radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Vavassori; Ba Jereczek-Fossa; D Zerini; L De Cicco; R Cambria; F Cattani; C Garibaldi; M Ciocca; R Orecchia
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2009-05-12

7.  Comparison of measurement methods with a mixed effects procedure accounting for replicated evaluations (COM3PARE): method comparison algorithm implementation for head and neck IGRT positional verification.

Authors:  Anuradha Roy; Clifton D Fuller; David I Rosenthal; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 8.  Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: What Do Clinicians Have to Know?

Authors:  Ben G L Vanneste; Evert J Van Limbergen; Emile N van Lin; Joep G H van Roermund; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  The Use of Ultrasound Imaging in the External Beam Radiotherapy Workflow of Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Saskia M Camps; Davide Fontanarosa; Peter H N de With; Frank Verhaegen; Ben G L Vanneste
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.