C L Allonby-Neve1, C D Okereke. 1. Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK. louiseallonby-neve@doctors.org.uk
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine the current practice in the management of adult facial soft tissue injuries in patients presenting to UK accident and emergency departments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaire study to the lead clinicians of 217 UK emergency departments seeing over 30,000 new patients annually. RESULTS: There was a 76% response rate. Suturing was the preferred method of closure, with the majority of clinicians preferring 6/0 or 5/0 non-resorbable sutures. Use of a regional nerve block would be considered by a quarter of clinicians, and adrenaline vasoconstrictor by a third. Referral rates ranged from 5-77% for a more complex wound. Maxillofacial services were preferred by 51% of respondents; on-site referral availability was indicated by only 28%, with an average journey of 16 miles for treatment. Up to 30% of clinicians considered prescribing antibiotics after wound closure, with flucloxacillin and co-amoxiclav most commonly suggested. Accident and emergency review rates ranged from 16% to 45%, with most wounds either being referred to the GP or no formal review being suggested. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey suggest that there is considerable variation in the initial management, referral and review of facial wounds in the UK. Further work is required to formulate guidelines for optimal patient care, ideally in conjuncture with the receiving surgical specialties.
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine the current practice in the management of adult facial soft tissue injuries in patients presenting to UK accident and emergency departments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaire study to the lead clinicians of 217 UK emergency departments seeing over 30,000 new patients annually. RESULTS: There was a 76% response rate. Suturing was the preferred method of closure, with the majority of clinicians preferring 6/0 or 5/0 non-resorbable sutures. Use of a regional nerve block would be considered by a quarter of clinicians, and adrenaline vasoconstrictor by a third. Referral rates ranged from 5-77% for a more complex wound. Maxillofacial services were preferred by 51% of respondents; on-site referral availability was indicated by only 28%, with an average journey of 16 miles for treatment. Up to 30% of clinicians considered prescribing antibiotics after wound closure, with flucloxacillin and co-amoxiclav most commonly suggested. Accident and emergency review rates ranged from 16% to 45%, with most wounds either being referred to the GP or no formal review being suggested. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey suggest that there is considerable variation in the initial management, referral and review of facial wounds in the UK. Further work is required to formulate guidelines for optimal patient care, ideally in conjuncture with the receiving surgical specialties.