Literature DB >> 16551393

Coronary artery bypass.

Ian Weir1.   

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting as a means of myocardial revascularisation is a remarkably successful operation. Over 25,000 procedures are carried out each year in the UK with an operative mortality of the order of 2% achieved despite an ageing surgical population. Over the last decade, a remarkable increase in the number of patients treated percutaneously by angioplasty and stenting has lead to a levelling off, or even a decline, in the number of patients treated surgically. In an attempt to reduce further the operative morbidity and mortality by excluding that attributable to the extracorporeal circulation, several surgical groups have pioneered performing the procedure without the heart-lung machine (off-pump or OPCAB). Although not a new concept there has been a dramatic increase in its use, lead by the development of sophisticated and disposable devices for stabilising the heart to enable the demanding anastomotic technique required to suture vessels of 1-2 mm often containing degenerative plaque. Concerns remain about the completeness of revascularisation and about the quality of the anastomoses obtained, particularly in the right and circumflex territories which are less accessible than the anterior descending artery. Although some reduction in morbidity has been demonstrated, this has not been as marked as had been hoped. Davies and Wallwork from Papworth argue persuasively and colourfully in favour of the conventional operation and point out the difficulties in designing an appropriate, prospective, randomised,controlled clinical trial because of the apparently small differences in outcome between the two techniques. Amrani and colleagues from Harefield, leading proponents of off-pump surgery using it in virtually 100% of patients undergoing revascularisation, extensively review the comparative literature to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16551393      PMCID: PMC1964100          DOI: 10.1308/003588406X95165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  27 in total

1.  Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Gianni D Angelini; Fiona C Taylor; Barnaby C Reeves; Raimondo Ascione
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-04-06       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Midterm angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  S N Omeroğlu; K Kirali; M Güler; M E Toker; G Ipek; O Işik; C Yakut
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Controversies in off-pump coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  John Pepper
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2005-02

4.  The clinical outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly patients.

Authors:  S Al-Ruzzeh; S George; M Yacoub; M Amrani
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  In-hospital outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass procedures: a multicenter experience.

Authors:  F Hernandez; W E Cohn; Y R Baribeau; J F Tryzelaar; D C Charlesworth; R A Clough; J D Klemperer; J R Morton; B M Westbrook; E M Olmstead; G T O'Connor
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Stroke after conventional versus minimally invasive coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  Sotiris C Stamou; Kathleen A Jablonski; Albert J Pfister; Peter C Hill; Mercedes K C Dullum; Ammar S Bafi; Steven W Boyce; Kathleen R Petro; Paul J Corso
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Neurological outcomes in coronary surgery: independent effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Nirav C Patel; Anand P Deodhar; Antony D Grayson; D Mark Pullan; Daniel J M Keenan; Ragheb Hasan; Brian M Fabri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients.

Authors:  Hendrik M Nathoe; Diederik van Dijk; Erik W L Jansen; Willem J L Suyker; Jan C Diephuis; Wim-Jan van Boven; Aart Brutel de la Rivière; Cornelius Borst; Cor J Kalkman; Diederick E Grobbee; Erik Buskens; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients?: a comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients.

Authors:  Sharif Al-Ruzzeh; Koki Nakamura; Thanos Athanasiou; Thomas Modine; Shane George; Magdi Yacoub; Charles Ilsley; Mohamed Amrani
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  J D Puskas; W H Williams; P G Duke; J R Staples; K E Glas; J J Marshall; M Leimbach; P Huber; S Garas; B H Sammons; S A McCall; R J Petersen; D E Bailey; H Chu; E M Mahoney; W S Weintraub; R A Guyton
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.