Literature DB >> 16549752

Quality of life of patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with nasopharyngectomy using the maxillary swing approach.

Raymond W-M Ng1, William I Wei.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors affecting the quality of life (QOL) of patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma who underwent a nasopharyngectomy using the maxillary swing approach.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaire data and medical chart review.
SETTING: Tertiary cancer referral center. PATIENTS: Patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma who underwent a nasopharyngectomy using the maxillary swing approach between January 1998 and December 2003, had a minimal follow-up of 3 months, and completed the questionnaire.
INTERVENTIONS: We measured QOL using the validated traditional Chinese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire and head and neck module. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive analysis of the results and comparison of scores for each QOL domain, stratified by presence of postoperative trismus, presence of postoperative palatal fistula, sex, age (< or = 45 years and > 45 years), duration of treatment (< or = 1 year and > 1 year), and disease status at follow-up, were performed using nonparametric tests.
RESULTS: Of the 50 eligible patients, 41 (32 men and 9 women; mean [SD] age, 51.5 [10.4] years) participated in the study. The mean +/- SD global QOL scale score of the participants was 68.7 +/- 24.2. Social functioning score was the lowest (64.6 +/- 25.9) of the 5 functioning scales. Fatigue and financial difficulties were the most common general concerns. Dryness of mouth, sticky saliva, and limited mouth opening were the most common head and neck problems. Women were found to have significantly lower QOL scores in the fatigue (P = .03), diarrhea (P = .03), and emotional functioning (P = .05) domains than men. The presence of severe trismus after the maxillary swing approach was significantly associated with a low QOL score in the mouth opening (P = .001), sticky saliva (P = .006), mouth dryness (P = .02), and social eating (P = .05) domains. However, the presence of palatal fistula, age, duration of treatment, and disease status at follow-up did not result in any significant differences on the QOL scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The QOL of patients treated with nasopharyngectomy using the maxillary swing approach to treat recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma was good. Female sex and the presence of postoperative trismus were factors significantly related to some of the QOL domain differences after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16549752     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.132.3.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  6 in total

Review 1.  Performance of the EORTC questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients EORTC QLQ-H&N35: a methodological review.

Authors:  Susanne Singer; Juan Ignacio Arraras; Wei-Chu Chie; Sheila E Fisher; Razvan Galalae; Eva Hammerlid; Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis; Claudia Schmalz; Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw; Eva Gamper; Judith Keszte; Dirk Hofmeister
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Morbidity profile and functional outcome of modified facial translocation approaches for skull base tumors.

Authors:  Vikram D Kekatpure; Gunesh P Rajan; Daxesh Patel; Nirav P Trivedi; P Arun; Subramania Iyer; Moni Abraham Kuriakose
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-07

3.  Determinants for further wishes for cosmetic and reconstructive interventions in 1652 patients with surgical treated carcinomas of the oral cavity.

Authors:  Henrik Holtmann; Simon Spalthoff; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Jörg Handschel; Julian Lommen; Norbert R Kübler; Gertrud Krüskemper; Majeed Rana; Karoline Sander
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-09-05

Review 4.  Trismus following different treatment modalities for head and neck cancer: a systematic review of subjective measures.

Authors:  Sook Y Loh; Robert W J Mcleod; Hassan A Elhassan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Quality of Life Following Salvage Endoscopic Nasopharyngectomy in Patients With Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Wanpeng Li; Hanyu Lu; Juan Liu; Quan Liu; Huan Wang; Huankang Zhang; Xicai Sun; Li Hu; Weidong Zhao; Yurong Gu; Houyong Li; Dehui Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Psychosocial Perspective using Mixed Method Approach.

Authors:  Tushti Bhardwaj
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2021-08-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.