Literature DB >> 16549604

Imaging characteristics of bone graft materials.

Francesca D Beaman1, Laura W Bancroft, Jeffrey J Peterson, Mark J Kransdorf, David M Menke, James K DeOrio.   

Abstract

Bone graft materials are widely used in reconstructive orthopedic procedures to promote new bone formation and bone healing, provide a substrate and scaffolding for development of bone structure, and function as a means for direct antibiotic delivery. Bone graft materials include autografts, allografts, and synthetic substitutes. An autograft (from the patient's own bone) supplies both bone volume and osteogenic cells capable of new bone formation. The imaging appearance of an autograft depends on its type, composition, and age. Autografts often appear as osseous fragments at radiography. At computed tomography (CT), autografts appear similar to the adjacent cortical bone. At magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, however, autografts have a variable appearance as a consequence of the viable marrow inside them, a feature not present in other graft materials. An allograft (from cadaveric bone) has an appearance similar to that of cortical bone on radiographs and CT images. An allograft in the form of bone chips or morsels does not show those features on radiographs and CT images, but instead appears as a conglomerate with medium to high opacity and attenuation within the bone defect. In the immediate postoperative period, allografts appear hypointense on both T1- and T2-weighted MR images. Hematopoietic tissue replaces the normal fatty marrow in the later phases of graft incorporation. Synthetic bone substitutes are much more variable in imaging appearance. As the use of bone allografts and synthetic substitutes increases, familiarity with postoperative imaging features is essential for differentiation between grafts and residual or recurrent disease. (c) RSNA, 2006.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16549604     DOI: 10.1148/rg.262055039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  16 in total

1.  The fate of grafting acetabular defects during revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Ryan M Nunley; Kirk E Smith; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Imaging following surgery for primary appendicular bone tumours.

Authors:  Imran Khan; Craig Gerrand; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants.

Authors:  Uta Scherer; Marcus Stoetzer; Martin Ruecker; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Constantin von See
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Polymer-controlled release of tobramycin from bone graft void filler.

Authors:  Amanda E Brooks; Benjamin D Brooks; Sherry N Davidoff; Paul C Hogrebe; Mark A Fisher; David W Grainger
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 5.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: review and update for radiologists.

Authors:  Kimia Khalatbari Kani; Felix S Chew
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Evaluation of accuracy in implant site preparation performed in single- or multi-step drilling procedures.

Authors:  Nadine Marheineke; Uta Scherer; Martin Rücker; Constantin von See; Björn Rahlf; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Marcus Stoetzer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Chronology of the radiographic appearances of the calcium sulphate-calcium phosphate synthetic bone graft composite following resection of bone tumours--a preliminary study of the normal post-operative appearances.

Authors:  Nikhil A Kotnis; Naveen Parasu; Karen Finlay; Erik Jurriaans; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Dual contrast agent for computed tomography and magnetic resonance hard tissue imaging.

Authors:  Manuela Ventura; Yi Sun; Viorel Rusu; Peter Laverman; Paul Borm; Arend Heerschap; Egbert Oosterwijk; Otto C Boerman; John A Jansen; X Frank Walboomers
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.056

9.  Sternal transplant using cadaveric allograft: quantitative and qualitative assessment of bone healing by computed tomography.

Authors:  Chiara Giraudo; Francesca Nistri; Pia Ferrigno; Giampiero Dolci; Roberto Stramare; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Marco Mammana; Emilio Quaia; Domenica Giunta; Andrea Dell'Amore; Federico Rea
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-02

10.  Allogeneic Bone Application in Association with Platelet-Rich Plasma for Alveolar Bone Grafting of Cleft Palate Defects.

Authors:  Cimara Fortes Ferreira; João Luiz Carlini; Ricardo de Souza Magini; José Nazareno Gil; André Luis Zétola
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2021-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.