Literature DB >> 16549388

Vep latency: sex and head size.

Bruno Gregori1, Stefano Pro, Francesco Bombelli, Maurizio La Riccia, Neri Accornero.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether differences in visual evoked potential (VEP) latencies in a large sample of healthy subjects are influenced by different head size or sex or both.
METHODS: Black-and-white pattern-reversal checkerboard VEPs at a frequency of 2c/deg. were recorded in a group of 54 normal subjects of both sexes (age 30.15+/-9.12 years). P100 latency was measured in all subjects and the data were analyzed in the whole sample and in a selected subgroup of subjects of both sexes with comparable head size.
RESULTS: In the study group overall, the P100 latency was slightly shorter in females than males and this small difference reached only weak statistical significance (P<0.04) whereas head size differed significantly between sexes (females<males) (P<0.001). No difference was found in the P100 latency in the subgroup of the two sexes with a comparable range of head size.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that VEP latency is relatively constant in a sample of healthy subjects. The slight sex difference in P100 latencies observed in a normal sample is mainly related to the slightly smaller average head size in females than in males. SIGNIFICANCE: Head size, not sex, should be considered for VEP latency normative studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16549388     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  4 in total

1.  Visual Evoked Potentials: Normative Values and Gender Differences.

Authors:  Ruby Sharma; Sandeep Joshi; K D Singh; Avnish Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-07-01

2.  Fullfield and extrafoveal visual evoked potentials in healthy eyes: reference data for a curved OLED display.

Authors:  Sabine Baumgarten; Tabea Hoberg; Tibor Lohmann; Babac Mazinani; Peter Walter; Antonis Koutsonas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Gender-based normative values for pattern-reversal and flash visually evoked potentials under binocular and monocular stimulation in healthy adults.

Authors:  Patrícia de Freitas Dotto; Adriana Berezovsky; Paula Yuri Sacai; Daniel Martins Rocha; Solange Rios Salomão
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The Development and Aging of the Magnocellular and Parvocellular Visual Pathways as Indicated by VEP Recordings between 5 and 84 Years of Age.

Authors:  György Benedek; Gyöngyi Horváth; Szabolcs Kéri; Gábor Braunitzer; Márta Janáky
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.