Literature DB >> 16549264

Lower prevalence of heart disease but higher mortality risk during follow-up was found among nonrespondents to a cohort study.

M Y Veenstra1, I H M Friesema, P J Zwietering, H F L Garretsen, J A Knottnerus, P H H M Lemmens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to assess the association between response behavior and health status at baseline, and survival in a 5-year follow-up period. A secondary aim was to assess whether reasons for nonresponse were associated with health status at baseline. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Data came from a prospective study cohort consisting of 31,349 men and women aged 45-70 years. Objective retrospective and prospective health information derived from general practitioner registries was available for both respondents and nonrespondents.
RESULTS: Results show that among respondents coronary heart disease was more prevalent. Compared with respondents, noncontacts had a higher mortality risk during follow-up. Refusals had hypercholesterolemia more often than did noncontacts, and coronary heart disease or diabetes mellitus less often.
CONCLUSION: The paradoxical results that respondents are less healthy at baseline but prospectively have a lower mortality risk may point to a selection effect indicating that the 'worried ill' are more inclined to participate. This effect could imply that observed relationships between risk factors or behaviors and outcomes in cohort studies may be attenuated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16549264     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Application of the Pattern-Mixture Latent Trajectory Model in an Epidemiological Study with Non-Ignorable Missingness.

Authors:  Hiroko H Dodge; Changyu Shen; Mary Ganguli
Journal:  J Data Sci       Date:  2008-04-01

2.  Alcohol intake and cardiovascular disease and mortality: the role of pre-existing disease.

Authors:  I H M Friesema; P J Zwietering; M Y Veenstra; J A Knottnerus; H F L Garretsen; P H H M Lemmens
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Effects of self-reported health conditions and pesticide exposures on probability of follow-up in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Martha P Montgomery; Freya Kamel; Jane A Hoppin; Laura E Beane Freeman; Michael C R Alavanja; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Investigation of selection bias using inverse probability weighting.

Authors:  Kazim Sheikh
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 12.434

5.  Evaluating selection bias in a population-based cohort study with low baseline participation: the LIFE-Adult-Study.

Authors:  Cornelia Enzenbach; Barbara Wicklein; Kerstin Wirkner; Markus Loeffler
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Community participation and sustainability--evidence over 25 years in the Västerbotten Intervention Programme.

Authors:  Margareta Norberg; Yulia Blomstedt; Göran Lönnberg; Lennarth Nyström; Hans Stenlund; Stig Wall; Lars Weinehall
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.