Literature DB >> 16549175

Comparison of spousal with other donor groups: Study of a single center.

J Roozbeh1, A R Mehdizadeh, M A Izadfar, A Razmkon, H Salahi, S-A Malek-Hosseini.   

Abstract

In coping with the shortage of living-related and cadaveric donor groups for renal transplantation, and in the fear of organ marketing, spousal donors are considered an invaluable potential source. Survival rates have been reported to be as high as even some related groups. This study evaluated 1039 renal transplantations up to 2003. Patient survival rates in different donor groups were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. The 3-year patient survival rates were 93% for kidneys from 61 spouses; 92% for kidneys from 433 living-related donors; 91% for kidneys from 427 living-unrelated (excluding spouses) donors; and 90.5% for 118 cadaveric kidneys. Such results were consistent with many other reports which consistently showed that spousal donors were at least as good as living-related donors, representing a reliable source in cases of organ shortage. The high survival rate of spousal donors is probably related to their strong emotional support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16549175     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.12.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  7 in total

1.  Spousal hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Ikegame; Katsuji Kaida; Satoshi Yoshihara; Kyoko Yoshihara; Shinichi Ishii; Takayuki Inoue; Masaya Okada; Hiroya Tamaki; Toshihiro Soma; Yasushi Kusunoki; Hiroto Kojima; Hiroh Saji; Hiroyasu Ogawa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Changing donor source pattern for kidney transplantation over 40 years: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Byung Ha Chung; Mi Hyang Jung; Sung Ha Bae; Suk Hui Kang; Hyeon Seok Hwang; Bok Jin Hyoung; So Young Lee; Youn Ju Jeon; Bum Soon Choi; Cheol Whee Park; Yong-Soo Kim; Ji-Il Kim; In Sung Moon; Chul Woo Yang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 2.884

3.  Clinical outcomes of the first 300 cases of kidney transplantation: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hyoung Won Koh; Kyunglim Koo; Chang Sik Shin; Hyung Sub Park; Jong Cheol Jeong; Sejoong Kim; Dong Wan Chae; Jong Jin Oh; Seok-Soo Byun; Taeseung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Transplant       Date:  2020-09-30

4.  Impact of ABO incompatible kidney transplantation on living donor transplantation.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Yu; Byung Ha Chung; Chul Woo Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Association Between Donor-Recipient Biological Relationship and Allograft Outcomes After Living Donor Kidney Transplant.

Authors:  S Ali Husain; Kristen L King; Navin Sanichar; R John Crew; Jesse D Schold; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-04-01

6.  Outcomes of spousal versus related donor kidney transplants: A comparative study.

Authors:  T Mittal; R Ramachandran; V Kumar; M Rathi; H S Kohli; V Jha; K L Gupta; M Minz; K Joshi; V Sakhuja
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2014-01

7.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between ABO-compatible and ABO-incompatible spousal donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Woo Yeong Park; Seong Sik Kang; Sung Bae Park; Ui Jun Park; Hyong Tae Kim; Won Hyun Cho; Seungyeup Han
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2016-01-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.