Literature DB >> 16548404

Research, audit and quality improvement.

Roger Paxton1, Paula Whitty, Ali Zaatar, Andrew Fairbairn, Jane Lothian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to clarify the distinction between research and audit, and propose appropriate regulatory arrangements for audit and related activities. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The methods used were literature reviews and conceptual analysis.
FINDINGS: Research and audit overlap in various ways, but differ in terms of their purposes and the risks likely to be encountered and distinguished, along with a third related category of activities called quality improvement. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Appropriate regulatory arrangements are proposed for audit and quality improvement activities. Using these should ensure appropriate ethical standards and risk management, while avoiding the time-consuming over-regulation that occurs when projects are unnecessarily submitted to the ethical scrutiny appropriate for research projects. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Gives suggestions and information that could be of great value in spreading service improvement.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16548404     DOI: 10.1108/09526860610642627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv        ISSN: 1366-0756


  2 in total

Review 1.  A decision tool to guide the ethics review of a challenging breed of emerging genomic projects.

Authors:  Yann Joly; Derek So; Gladys Osien; Laura Crimi; Martin Bobrow; Don Chalmers; Susan E Wallace; Nikolajs Zeps; Bartha Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Infection prevention and control self-audit: just a tick box exercise?

Authors:  Michelle Gorrell
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2013-11-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.