Literature DB >> 16548005

Transcatheter device versus surgical closure of ventricular septal defects: a clinical decision analysis.

Ilyas S Aleem1, Tara Karamlou, Lee N Benson, Brian W McCrindle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare transcatheter device versus surgical closure of ventricular septal defects (VSDs).
METHODS: A clinical decision analysis was performed using standard gamble interviews.
RESULTS: Device was initially preferred in 39 respondents (89%) and surgery in 5 (11%). The inherent difference in value between a perfect surgery and a perfect device (disutility of surgery) was equal to a mean risk of death of (1.2 +/- 2.2)%. Final values from decision analysis were initially equivalent. Values adjusted for estimated mortality, however, favored device (mean: 0.979 +/- 0.032) versus surgery (mean: 0.971 +/- 0.032), P = 0.052. When values were further adjusted for disutilities, device was significantly preferred (0.978 +/- 0.032) versus surgery (0.961 +/- 0.044), P < 0.005. Surgery would be preferred if the probability of major complications decreased below 5% or minor complications below 6%.
CONCLUSIONS: When outcomes and their values are considered in a systematic manner, transcatheter device closure of suitable VSDs is favored over surgical repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16548005     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

1.  A decision analysis of amputation versus reconstruction for severe open tibial fracture from the physician and patient perspectives.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Melissa J Shauver; Daniel Saddawi-Konefka; Steven C Haase
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.539

2.  Clinical decision analysis: Incorporating the evidence with patient preferences.

Authors:  Ilyas S Aleem; Hamza Jalal; Idris S Aleem; Adeel A Sheikh; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  What is a clinical decision analysis study?

Authors:  Ilyas S Aleem; Emil H Schemitsch; Beate P Hanson
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.251

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.