Literature DB >> 16547656

[Feasibility and safety of long-term AAI(R) pacing in isolated sinus node syndrome].

T Körber1, W Voss, B Ismer, F Weber, C A Nienaber, G H von Knorre.   

Abstract

Recent investigations prove that AAI(R) pacing is the "ideal" stimulation mode in isolated sick sinus syndrome. Nevertheless, in Germany this bradycardia is treated by AAI(R) pacemakers in less than 4% of cases compared to 25% in other countries. In our institution treatment of patients with isolated sick sinus syndrome is uniform and corresponds to the actual guidelines since the early 1990s; therefore the aim of our study was to analyze feasibility and safety of AAI(R) pacing in a retrospective study. Between 1998 and 2000, 52 of 165 patients (31.5%) with isolated sick sinus syndrome were treated by an AAI(R) pacemaker. The median follow-up duration was 51.5 months (minimal: 36 months). 6 patients died, in all cases unrelated to the stimulation mode. Three patients required reoperations, however, in only one case due to second degree AV block with the need for upgrading to DDD stimulation. Thus, the yearly incidence of this specific complication in the AAI(R) cohort is 0.64%.In conclusion, permanent atrial stimulation in isolated sick sinus syndrome is feasible in a quarter of all cases. It is safe if performed corresponding to actual guidelines. Additionally, single lead AAI(R) pacing is a cost-effective therapy and the only stimulation mode which, today, reliably prevents unnecessary right ventricular stimulation. If, on the other hand, algorithms providing automatic mode switching from AAI to DDD and vice versa are implemented reliably into all dual chamber pacemakers, single chamber atrial pacing will no longer be a subject for discussion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16547656     DOI: 10.1007/s00399-006-0503-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol        ISSN: 0938-7412


  22 in total

1.  Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators.

Authors:  S J Connolly; C R Kerr; M Gent; R S Roberts; S Yusuf; A M Gillis; M H Sami; M Talajic; A S Tang; G J Klein; C Lau; D M Newman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  [A statement about guidelines on pacemaker therapy].

Authors:  B Lemke; K Ryback; U Wiegand; R Dietz; M Gottwik; B Levenson; T Meinertz; A Osterspey; U Tebbe; R H Strasser; K Werdan; G Arnold; D Behrenbeck; E Fleck; H J Trappe
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2003-02

3.  Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.

Authors:  Hiroshi Masumoto; Yuichi Ueda; Rinya Kato; Akihiko Usui; Takashi Maseki; Yasushi Takagi; Masato Usui
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  [Guidelines for heart pacemaker therapy].

Authors:  B Lemke; B Nowak; D Pfeiffer
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-10

5.  Atrioventricular conduction during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome.

Authors:  H R Andersen; J C Nielsen; P E Thomsen; L Thuesen; T Vesterlund; A K Pedersen; P T Mortensen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-09-29       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Atrial pacing should be used more frequently in sinus node disease.

Authors:  Ian G Tripp; Guy P Armstrong; James T Stewart; Margaret A Hood; Warren M Smith
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.

Authors:  Michael O Sweeney; Anne S Hellkamp; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Arnold J Greenspon; Roger A Freedman; Kerry L Lee; Gervasio A Lamas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-02       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome.

Authors:  H R Andersen; J C Nielsen; P E Thomsen; L Thuesen; P T Mortensen; T Vesterlund; A K Pedersen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.

Authors:  J Brandt; H Anderson; T Fåhraeus; H Schüller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  M Rosenqvist; J Brandt; H Schüller
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Maintenance of AAI(R) mode at the time of generator replacement].

Authors:  E Wunderlich; H Schindler; A Hetze; C Wunderlich
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2010-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.