Genevieve N Wu1, Judith M Ford, Jeffry R Alger. 1. Inter-Departmental Graduate Program in Biomedical Physics, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. nwu@ucla.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Motexafin gadolinium (MGd) is an investigational pharmaceutical with radiation enhancing properties. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was used to measure brain and tumor MGd levels to evaluate (1) the degree to which MGd passes through the intact blood brain barrier, and (2) the retention of MGd in tumor in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: MRI studies were performed on GBM patients who participated in a phase I clinical trial in which MGd was given during standard fractionated radiation therapy. MGd was administered daily (Monday to Friday) for five or 10 doses as a loading regimen, followed by three times per week dosing as a maintenance schedule. T1-weighted MRI was performed at intervals throughout the course of the MGd administration and radiation therapy in the 33 participating patients. Eleven patients had pre- and post-MGd scans, allowing for study of MGd's normal blood brain barrier penetration. Twenty-two patients had adequate residual tumor for measurements to evaluate MGd retention in tumor during the course of MGd and radiation administration. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The studies of uninvolved brain tissue support the conclusion that MGd does not cross the intact blood brain barrier in detectable quantities. The tumor study showed MGd uptake during loading and maintenance without measurably significant fall off on non-dosage days during the maintenance dosing. Although the number of cases is small, the 10-day loading regimen showed greater drug loading and retention compared with the 5 days loading regimen.
PURPOSE:Motexafin gadolinium (MGd) is an investigational pharmaceutical with radiation enhancing properties. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was used to measure brain and tumorMGd levels to evaluate (1) the degree to which MGd passes through the intact blood brain barrier, and (2) the retention of MGd in tumor in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: MRI studies were performed on GBM patients who participated in a phase I clinical trial in which MGd was given during standard fractionated radiation therapy. MGd was administered daily (Monday to Friday) for five or 10 doses as a loading regimen, followed by three times per week dosing as a maintenance schedule. T1-weighted MRI was performed at intervals throughout the course of the MGd administration and radiation therapy in the 33 participating patients. Eleven patients had pre- and post-MGd scans, allowing for study of MGd's normal blood brain barrier penetration. Twenty-two patients had adequate residual tumor for measurements to evaluate MGd retention in tumor during the course of MGd and radiation administration. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The studies of uninvolved brain tissue support the conclusion that MGd does not cross the intact blood brain barrier in detectable quantities. The tumor study showed MGd uptake during loading and maintenance without measurably significant fall off on non-dosage days during the maintenance dosing. Although the number of cases is small, the 10-day loading regimen showed greater drug loading and retention compared with the 5 days loading regimen.
Authors: M Brada; K Hoang-Xuan; R Rampling; P Y Dietrich; L Y Dirix; D Macdonald; J J Heimans; B A Zonnenberg; J M Bravo-Marques; R Henriksson; R Stupp; N Yue; J Bruner; M Dugan; S Rao; S Zaknoen Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: R A Miller; K Woodburn; Q Fan; M F Renschler; J L Sessler; J A Koutcher Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: R G Henry; D B Vigneron; N J Fischbein; P E Grant; M R Day; S M Noworolski; J M Star-Lack; L L Wald; W P Dillon; S M Chang; S J Nelson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: P Carde; R Timmerman; M P Mehta; C D Koprowski; J Ford; R B Tishler; D Miles; R A Miller; M F Renschler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S Xu; K Zakian; H Thaler; C Matei; A Alfieri; Y Chen; J A Koutcher Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-04-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: S W Young; M K Sidhu; F Qing; H H Muller; M Neuder; G Zanassi; T D Mody; G Hemmi; W Dow; J D Mutch Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: W J Curran; C B Scott; J Horton; J S Nelson; A S Weinstein; A J Fischbach; C H Chang; M Rotman; S O Asbell; R E Krisch Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-05-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Christina A Meyers; Jennifer A Smith; Andrea Bezjak; Minesh P Mehta; James Liebmann; Tim Illidge; Ian Kunkler; Jean-Michel Caudrelier; Peter D Eisenberg; Jacobus Meerwaldt; Ross Siemers; Christian Carrie; Laurie E Gaspar; Walter Curran; See-Chun Phan; Richard A Miller; Markus F Renschler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Minesh P Mehta; Patrick Rodrigus; C H J Terhaard; Aroor Rao; John Suh; Wilson Roa; Luis Souhami; Andrea Bezjak; Mark Leibenhaut; Ritsuko Komaki; Christopher Schultz; Robert Timmerman; Walter Curran; Jennifer Smith; See-Chun Phan; Richard A Miller; Markus F Renschler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kaisorn L Chaichana; Khan K Chaichana; Alessandro Olivi; Jon D Weingart; Richard Bennett; Henry Brem; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Kaisorn L Chaichana; Tomas Garzon-Muvdi; Scott Parker; Jon D Weingart; Alessandro Olivi; Richard Bennett; Henry Brem; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Derek R McHaffie; Pierre Chabot; Anne Dagnault; John H Suh; Marie-Andrée Fortin; Eric Chang; Robert Timmerman; Luis Souhami; John Grecula; Abdenour Nabid; Chris Schultz; Maria Werner-Wasik; Laurie E Gaspar; David Brachman; Tarak Mody; Minesh P Mehta Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2011-04-27 Impact factor: 4.130