Literature DB >> 16547368

Phenotyping of genetically engineered mice: humane, ethical, environmental, and husbandry issues.

Marilyn J Brown1, Kathleen A Murray.   

Abstract

The growing use of genetically engineered (GE) mice in scientific research has raised many concerns about the animal welfare of such mice. The types of welfare concerns may differ within the three stages that comprise the establishment of GE animal models: development, production, and research use. The role and impact of the members of the research team on these concerns may also vary with each stage. To make both scientific and animal welfare decisions at each stage, it is necessary to have a thorough knowledge of the animal model-in this case, the phenotypic expression of the GE animal. Phenotype screening is the analysis of visible or measurable characteristics of an animal that result from the genotype and its interaction with the environment. Phenotypes expressed that are relevant to the research program are usually carefully investigated; however, those that may have an impact on the animal's welfare but have little or no impact on the disease process under study are often less carefully studied. Thorough analysis and documentation of the animal welfare aspects of phenotype provide the research team with the information they need to control the environment to minimize negative animal welfare effects. Such information is also essential to allow members of the institutional animal care and use committee to perform necessary cost:benefit ethical review of proposed GE animal studies. Investigators who submit information about models for publication should document all aspects of a phenotype, including the area of scientific interest as well as those areas that affect animal welfare, for clarity and for subsequent research with the respective models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16547368     DOI: 10.1093/ilar.47.2.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ILAR J        ISSN: 1084-2020


  4 in total

Review 1.  TALEN gene editing takes aim on HIV.

Authors:  Ronald Benjamin; Bradford K Berges; Antonio Solis-Leal; Omoyemwen Igbinedion; Christy L Strong; Martin R Schiller
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Guidelines for in vivo mouse models of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Merry L Lindsey; Keith R Brunt; Jonathan A Kirk; Petra Kleinbongard; John W Calvert; Lisandra E de Castro Brás; Kristine Y DeLeon-Pennell; Dominic P Del Re; Nikolaos G Frangogiannis; Stefan Frantz; Richard J Gumina; Ganesh V Halade; Steven P Jones; Rebecca H Ritchie; Francis G Spinale; Edward B Thorp; Crystal M Ripplinger; Zamaneh Kassiri
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 5.125

3.  Phenotyping spontaneous locomotor activity in inbred and outbred mouse strains by using Digital Ventilated Cages.

Authors:  Sara Fuochi; Mara Rigamonti; Fabio Iannello; Marcello Raspa; Ferdinando Scavizzi; Paolo de Girolamo; Livia D'Angelo
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 12.625

4.  High-throughput screening of mouse gene knockouts identifies established and novel skeletal phenotypes.

Authors:  Robert Brommage; Jeff Liu; Gwenn M Hansen; Laura L Kirkpatrick; David G Potter; Arthur T Sands; Brian Zambrowicz; David R Powell; Peter Vogel
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 13.567

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.