Literature DB >> 16547125

Characterization of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) mutants affected in their flowering time and in the morphogenesis of their reproductive structure.

Muriel Quinet1, Céline Dubois, Marie-Christine Goffin, Jaime Chao, Vincent Dielen, Henri Batoko, Marc Boutry, Jean-Marie Kinet.   

Abstract

The impact of the season on flowering time and the organization and morphogenesis of the reproductive structures are described in three tomato mutants: compound inflorescence (s), single flower truss (sft), and jointless (j), respectively, compared with their wild-type cultivars Ailsa Craig (AC), Platense (Pl), and Heinz (Hz). In all environmental conditions, the sft mutant flowered significantly later than its corresponding Pl cultivar while flowering time in j was only marginally, but consistently, delayed compared with Hz. The SFT gene and, to a lesser extent, the J gene thus appear to be constitutive flowering promoters. Flowering in s was delayed in winter but not in summer compared with the AC cultivar, suggesting the existence of an environmentally regulated pathway for the control of floral transition. The reproductive structure of tomato is a raceme-like inflorescence and genes regulating its morphogenesis may thus be divided into inflorescence and floral meristem identity genes as in Arabidopsis. The s mutant developed highly branched inflorescences bearing up to 200 flowers due to the conversion of floral meristems into inflorescence meristems. The S gene appears to be a floral meristem identity gene. Both sft and j mutants formed reproductive structures containing flowers and leaves and reverting to a vegetative sympodial growth. The SFT gene appears to regulate the identity of the inflorescence meristem of tomato and is also involved, along with the J gene, in the maintenance of this identity, preventing reversion to a vegetative identity. These results are discussed in relation to knowledge accumulated in Arabidopsis and to domestication processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16547125     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erj117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  13 in total

1.  Rate of meristem maturation determines inflorescence architecture in tomato.

Authors:  Soon Ju Park; Ke Jiang; Michael C Schatz; Zachary B Lippman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Phenotypic and genetic characterization of the pistillate mutation in tomato.

Authors:  Irene Olimpieri; Andrea Mazzucato
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Revisiting the involvement of SELF-PRUNING in the sympodial growth of tomato.

Authors:  Johanna Thouet; Muriel Quinet; Sandra Ormenese; Jean-Marie Kinet; Claire Périlleux
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Genetic interactions of the unfinished flower development (ufd) mutant support a significant role of the tomato UFD gene in regulating floral organogenesis.

Authors:  Sandra Poyatos-Pertíñez; Muriel Quinet; Ana Ortíz-Atienza; Sandra Bretones; Fernando J Yuste-Lisbona; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  Plant Reprod       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.767

5.  Repression of floral meristem fate is crucial in shaping tomato inflorescence.

Authors:  Johanna Thouet; Muriel Quinet; Stanley Lutts; Jean-Marie Kinet; Claire Périlleux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Characterization of vegetative inflorescence (mc-vin) mutant provides new insight into the role of MACROCALYX in regulating inflorescence development of tomato.

Authors:  Fernando J Yuste-Lisbona; Muriel Quinet; Antonia Fernández-Lozano; Benito Pineda; Vicente Moreno; Trinidad Angosto; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  BIFURCATE FLOWER TRUSS: a novel locus controlling inflorescence branching in tomato contains a defective MAP kinase gene.

Authors:  Demetryus Silva Ferreira; Zoltan Kevei; Tomasz Kurowski; Maria Esther de Noronha Fonseca; Fady Mohareb; Leonardo S Boiteux; Andrew J Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 6.992

8.  Inflorescence development in tomato: gene functions within a zigzag model.

Authors:  Claire Périlleux; Guillaume Lobet; Pierre Tocquin
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Manipulation of flowering time and branching by overexpression of the tomato transcription factor SlZFP2.

Authors:  Lin Weng; Xiaodong Bai; Fangfang Zhao; Rong Li; Han Xiao
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 9.803

10.  Transcriptomics analysis of the flowering regulatory genes involved in the herbicide resistance of Asia minor bluegrass (Polypogon fugax).

Authors:  Fengyan Zhou; Yong Zhang; Wei Tang; Mei Wang; Tongchun Gao
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.