Literature DB >> 16546794

Comparison of eggshell hygiene in two housing systems: standard and furnished cages.

S Mallet1, V Guesdon, A M H Ahmed, Y Nys.   

Abstract

1. The hygienic properties of eggs produced in two designs of furnished cage were investigated and compared to two standard cage designs. 2. At 28, 37, 47 and 58 weeks of age, the proportion of dirty eggs was higher in one of the furnished cage designs while, in the other, it was similar to standard cages. 3. At 27, 33 and 60 weeks, the bacterial load on the eggshell (total aerobic bacteria and enterococci) was higher in furnished cage designs. A seasonal effect was observed with lower counts at 60 weeks (winter) than at 27 weeks (summer). 4. More dirty eggs and a higher bacterial load were observed in eggs laid outside the nests, which suggests egg hygiene in furnished cages could be similar to standard cages if the equipment in furnished cages was improved to enhance nest laying.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16546794     DOI: 10.1080/00071660500468132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  4 in total

1.  Exterior egg quality as affected by enrichment resources layout in furnished laying-hen cages.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Donghua Chen; Fanyu Meng; Yingying Su; Lisha Wang; Runxiang Zhang; Jianhong Li; Jun Bao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.509

2.  Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality.

Authors:  M Ahammed; B J Chae; J Lohakare; B Keohavong; M H Lee; S J Lee; D M Kim; J Y Lee; S J Ohh
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Influence of commercial laying hen housing systems on the incidence and identification of Salmonella and Campylobacter.

Authors:  D R Jones; J Guard; R K Gast; R J Buhr; P J Fedorka-Cray; Z Abdo; J R Plumblee; D V Bourassa; N A Cox; L L Rigsby; C I Robison; P Regmi; D M Karcher
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Microbiological impact of three commercial laying hen housing systems.

Authors:  D R Jones; N A Cox; J Guard; P J Fedorka-Cray; R J Buhr; R K Gast; Z Abdo; L L Rigsby; J R Plumblee; D M Karcher; C I Robison; R A Blatchford; M M Makagon
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.