Literature DB >> 16546790

Effects of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg quality.

V Guesdon1, A M H Ahmed, S Mallet, J M Faure, Y Nys.   

Abstract

1. Conventional cages are to be replaced by furnished cages or aviary systems to improve the welfare of hens. We compared the performance and egg quality of hens reared in two designs of furnished cages and of two standard cages. We also explored the consequences of the absence of beak trimming when using these designs. 2. Hens (2028) were housed from 18 to 70 weeks of age in 108 standard cages at 6 per cage (60 cmx63.5 cm), in 96 cages at 5 per cage (59.5 cmx55.5 cm) or in two designs of furnished cage at 15 per cage (24 F15M cages and 36 F15P cages made by two manufacturers) which contained equipment varying in size and location (nests, dust baths and perches). Half of the hens were beak-trimmed in each design. 3. Mortality was low in beak-trimmed hens (<5%) but was unacceptably high in non-beak-trimmed hens due to cannibalism (>40%, 516 hens). Mortality was worse in standard cages than in furnished cages. Consequently, hen-housed egg production was significantly lowered in non-beak-trimmed hens. 4. Egg laying in beak-trimmed hens reared in furnished cages occurred mainly in the nest (80 and 84.8% in F15M and F15P) but also in the dust bath (13.3 and 9.4% in F15M and F15P) and in other parts of the cage (6.7 and 5.8% in F15M and F15P). 5. The total percentage of broken (visual observation) and hair-cracked eggs (candling) was high in the furnished cage designs (15.4 and 19.6% in F15M and F15P, respectively) compared with standard cage designs (8.1 and 12.2% in S6 and S5). This was mainly due to hair-cracked eggs, the highest percentages occurring in the nests, especially in the design with a narrow nest and no egg saver (11.1% in F15M compared to 17.6% in F15P) as a consequence of egg accumulation in the cradle and relatively low frequency of manual egg collection. 6. Eggshell quality (index and breaking strength) was only slightly influenced by cage effects so differences in egg breakage were attributable to impacts related to cage design. 7. It is concluded that beak trimming remains the most effective way to prevent cannibalism, although furnished cages with a large group of hens slightly reduced the incidence, and that further development and optimisation of furnished cages is needed to reach egg quality similar to standard cages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16546790     DOI: 10.1080/00071660500468124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  7 in total

1.  Can Non-Beak Treated Hens be Kept in Commercial Furnished Cages? Exploring the Effects of Strain and Extra Environmental Enrichment on Behaviour, Feather Cover, and Mortality.

Authors:  Krysta L H Morrissey; Sarah Brocklehurst; Laurence Baker; Tina M Widowski; Victoria Sandilands
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens.

Authors:  Andrew M Janczak; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Exterior egg quality as affected by enrichment resources layout in furnished laying-hen cages.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Donghua Chen; Fanyu Meng; Yingying Su; Lisha Wang; Runxiang Zhang; Jianhong Li; Jun Bao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  The influence of environmental enrichment and stocking density on the plumage and health conditions of laying hen pullets.

Authors:  Christopher J Liebers; Angela Schwarzer; Michael Erhard; Paul Schmidt; Helen Louton
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Effect of pecking stones and age on feather cover, hen mortality, and performance in free-range laying hens.

Authors:  Zafar Iqbal; Kelly Drake; Robert Alfonso Swick; Peta Simone Taylor; Rider Anderson Perez-Maldonado; Isabelle Ruhnke
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality.

Authors:  M Ahammed; B J Chae; J Lohakare; B Keohavong; M H Lee; S J Lee; D M Kim; J Y Lee; S J Ohh
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Dietary Inositol Reduces Fearfulness and Avoidance in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Eugenia Herwig; Henry L Classen; Carrie L Walk; Mike Bedford; Karen Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.