Literature DB >> 16546376

Servers for protein structure prediction.

Daniel Fischer1.   

Abstract

The 1990s cultivated a generation of protein structure human predictors. As a result of structural genomics and genome sequencing projects, and significant improvements in the performance of protein structure prediction methods, a generation of automated servers has evolved in the past few years. Servers for close and distant homology modeling are now routinely used by many biologists, and have already been applied to the experimental structure determination process itself, and to the interpretation and annotation of genome sequences. Because dozens of servers are currently available, it is hard for a biologist to know which server(s) to use; however, the state of the art of these methods is now assessed through the LiveBench and CAFASP experiments. Meta-servers--servers that use the results of other autonomous servers to produce a consensus prediction--have proven to be the best performers, and are already challenging all but a handful of expert human predictors. The difference in performance of the top ten autonomous (non-meta) servers is small and hard to assess using relatively small test sets. Recent experiments suggest that servers will soon free humans from most of the burden of protein structure prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16546376     DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  29 in total

Review 1.  Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 2.  What in silico molecular docking can do for the 'bench-working biologists'.

Authors:  Marius Mihăşan
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  A novel method for protein-protein interaction site prediction using phylogenetic substitution models.

Authors:  David La; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-12

4.  Effect of using suboptimal alignments in template-based protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-01

5.  LOMETS2: improved meta-threading server for fold-recognition and structure-based function annotation for distant-homology proteins.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Chengxin Zhang; Qiqige Wuyun; Robin Pearce; Yang Li; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Template-based protein modeling: recent methodological advances.

Authors:  Pankaj R Daga; Ronak Y Patel; Robert J Doerksen
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Protein structure prediction: when is it useful?

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  The bHLH142 Transcription Factor Coordinates with TDR1 to Modulate the Expression of EAT1 and Regulate Pollen Development in Rice.

Authors:  Swee-Suak Ko; Min-Jeng Li; Maurice Sun-Ben Ku; Yi-Cheng Ho; Yi-Jyun Lin; Ming-Hsing Chuang; Hong-Xian Hsing; Yi-Chen Lien; Hui-Ting Yang; Hung-Chia Chang; Ming-Tsair Chan
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.

Authors:  Pascal Benkert; Torsten Schwede; Silvio Ce Tosatto
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-05-20

10.  Discriminating the native structure from decoys using scoring functions based on the residue packing in globular proteins.

Authors:  Ranjit Prasad Bahadur; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.