Literature DB >> 16545721

Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment.

Jörg F Schirrmeister1, Karl-Thomas Wrbas, Felix H Schneider, Markus J Altenburger, Elmar Hellwig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study intended to compare the effectiveness of hand files and FlexMaster, ProTaper, and RaCe rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment. STUDY
DESIGN: Sixty curved mandibular premolars were randomly divided into 4 groups of 15 specimens each. The canals were enlarged and obturated using lateral condensation technique. After repreparation with the test instruments the specimens were cleared. The area of remaining obturation material was measured from 2 directions. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and a closed test procedure.
RESULTS: RaCe instruments revealed significantly less residual obturation material than FlexMaster files (P < .05). No significant difference was found among the hand file, ProTaper, and FlexMaster groups (P > .05). There were 5 fractured instruments in the ProTaper group and 3 in the FlexMaster group.
CONCLUSION: The RaCe system is an efficient and safe device for gutta-percha removal in curved root canals.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16545721     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of Time Required by D-RaCe, R-Endo and Mtwo Instruments for Retreatment: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Akansha Garg; Ajay Nagpal; Shashit Shetty; Sunil Kumar; Kamal Krishan Singh; Amit Garg
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-02-01

2.  A comparative evaluation of gutta percha removal and extrusion of apical debris by rotary and hand files.

Authors:  A V Rajesh Ebenezar; Mohan Kumar; A Sivakumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-11-20

3.  Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal.

Authors:  Mary Kinue Nakamune Uezu; Maria Leticia Borges Britto; Cleber K Nabeshima; Raul Capp Pallotta
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Cyclic fatigue resistance of D-RaCe, ProTaper, and Mtwo nickel-titanium retreatment instruments after immersion in sodium hypochlorite.

Authors:  Hüseyin Sinan Topçuoğlu; Kanşad Pala; Ahmet Aktı; Salih Düzgün; Gamze Topçuoğlu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Evaluation of manual and two-rotary niti retreatment systems in removing gutta-percha obturated with two root canal sealers.

Authors:  Athikesavan Jayasenthil; Emmanuel Solomon Sathish; Prashanth Prakash
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2012-09-10

6.  Detection of residual obturation material after root canal retreatment with three different techniques using a dental operating microscope and a stereomicroscope: An in vitro comparative evaluation.

Authors:  Raju Chauhan; Ap Tikku; Anil Chandra
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-07

7.  Efficacy of ProTaper Retreatment System in Root Canals Obturated with Gutta-Percha Using Two Different Sealers and GuttaFlow.

Authors:  Jaya Siotia; Shashi Rashmi Acharya; Sunil Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-10-23

8.  Efficacy of ProTaper and Mtwo Retreatment Files in Removal of Gutta-percha and GuttaFlow from Root Canals.

Authors:  Sedigheh Khedmat; Abbas Azari; Ahmad Reza Shamshiri; Mehdi Fadae; Hoorieh Bashizadeh Fakhar
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2016-05-01

9.  In vitro evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for gutta percha removal during root canal retreatment.

Authors:  Mercy Joseph; Jyoti Ahlawat; Amit Malhotra; Murali Rao; Abhimanyu Sharma; Sangeeta Talwar
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-10-01

10.  An in vitro CT Comparison of Gutta-Percha Removal with Two Rotary Systems and Hedstrom Files.

Authors:  Pankaj Yadav; Makonahalli Jaganath Bharath; Chickmagravalli Krishnegowda Sahadev; Praveen Kumar Makonahalli Ramachandra; Yogesh Rao; Ambereen Ali; Shahnawaz Mohamed
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.