Literature DB >> 16545618

Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review.

Margit Dueholm1.   

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to relate the image findings of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) to structural changes of adenomyosis; in order to clarify the present clinical diagnostic approach in the diagnosis of adenomyosis, the performance of TVS is evaluated in comparison to other diagnostic modalities. A Medline search of papers in English on the use of TVS and needle biopsy for the diagnosis of adenomyosis was carried out. It was found that TVS is highly observer-dependent, but in the hands of experienced investigators it has an adequate diagnostic accuracy in clinically suspected cases. The diagnostic accuracy of TVS is at an intermediate level but is in line with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in unselected patients without myomas undergoing surgery. TVS is a sufficiently accurate tool for diagnosis of adenomyosis in clinically suspected cases, but not in unselected premenopausal women with myomas. Resectoscopic hysteroscopic biopsy has not been sufficiently evaluated but could be a useful diagnostic tool, whereas needle biopsy is not. In conclusion, in clinically suspected adenomyosis cases TVS should be favoured as the primary diagnostic tool. Substantial experience and specific training is required for TVS to be a useful diagnostic tool in adenomyosis. MRI may be considered when TVS is inconclusive. Clinicians should above all be observant of image findings of adenomyosis in patients with no wish to preserve fertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16545618     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  22 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review with meta-analysis: the common sonographic characteristics of adenomyosis.

Authors:  Katherine Dartmouth
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2014-03-25

2.  MRI, US or real-time virtual sonography in the evaluation of adenomyosis?

Authors:  Valeria Vinci; Matteo Saldari; Maria Eleonora Sergi; Silvia Bernardo; Giuseppe Rizzo; Maria Grazia Porpora; Carlo Catalano; Lucia Manganaro
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Combination therapeutic effects of high intensity focused ultrasound and Metformin for the treatment of adenomyosis.

Authors:  Yanmei Hou; Zhenli Qin; Kefeng Fan; Yanhua Xu; Xiaoge Huang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Value of ultrasound shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.

Authors:  S Acar; E Millar; M Mitkova; V Mitkov
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2016-10-12

5.  Role of 3D Ultrasound and Doppler in Differentiating Clinically Suspected Cases of Leiomyoma and Adenomyosis of Uterus.

Authors:  Kaveri Sharma; Manash Kumar Bora; B P Venkatesh; Partho Barman; Sumit Kumar Roy; Usha Jayagurunathan; Eswaramoorthy Sellamuthu; Fazil Moidu
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 6.  Adenomyosis: from the sign to the diagnosis. Imaging, diagnostic pitfalls and differential diagnosis: a pictorial review.

Authors:  A L Valentini; S Speca; B Gui; G Soglia; B G Soglia; M Miccò; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  Adenomyosis and infertility.

Authors:  Gaby Moawad; Mira H Kheil; Jean Marc Ayoubi; Jordan S Klebanoff; Sara Rahman; Fady I Sharara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images for computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Jie Ying Wu; Adam Tuomi; Michael D Beland; Joseph Konrad; David Glidden; David Grand; Derek Merck
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-01-25

9.  Infertility and adenomyosis.

Authors:  Sebastiano Campo; Vincenzo Campo; Giuseppe Benagiano
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-12-26

10.  Sonographic Signs of Adenomyosis in Women with Endometriosis Are Associated with Infertility.

Authors:  Dean Decter; Nissim Arbib; Hila Markovitz; Daniel S Seidman; Vered H Eisenberg
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.