| Literature DB >> 16545508 |
Beth D Jamieson1, F Javier Ibarrondo, Johnson T Wong, Mary Ann Hausner, Hwee L Ng, Marie Fuerst, Charles Price, Roger Shih, Julie Elliott, Patricia M Hultin, Lance E Hultin, Peter A Anton, Otto O Yang.
Abstract
Many vaccine approaches emphasize producing HIV-1-specific CD8+ T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses. Towards this goal, many studies simply classify vaccinees as "responders" or "nonresponders," based on arbitrary cutoff criteria. HIV-1-uninfected participants receiving the TBC-3B vaccine were assessed for HIV-1-specific CTL by interferon-gamma ELISpot, and compared to HIV-1-infected control subjects not on antiretroviral therapy. Vaccinees also were tested for HIV-1-specific antibody responses and generalized CD8+ T-lymphocyte activation. Different criteria for vaccine "responder" status were applied to the measured CTL values. The vaccinees showed evidence of vaccine exposure by CD8+ T-lymphocyte activation and HIV-1-specific antibodies. Considering any single positive HIV-1-specific CTL measurement a vaccine "response," all vaccinees could be classified as "responders," but even slight increases in the stringency of response criteria resulted in a steep decline of the "response" rate. In contrast, HIV-1-infected persons were clearly "responders" against the same proteins by the same criteria. Quantitative assessment of CTL demonstrated low and transient HIV-1-specific CTL compared to natural infection. These analyses emphasize the pitfalls of summarizing vaccine study results using simple cutoff criteria to define response rates, and suggest the utility of more comprehensive descriptions to describe vaccine immunogenicity and persistence of responses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16545508 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.02.023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccine ISSN: 0264-410X Impact factor: 3.641