Literature DB >> 16545328

Modeling motor vehicle crashes using Poisson-gamma models: examining the effects of low sample mean values and small sample size on the estimation of the fixed dispersion parameter.

Dominique Lord1.   

Abstract

There has been considerable research conducted on the development of statistical models for predicting crashes on highway facilities. Despite numerous advancements made for improving the estimation tools of statistical models, the most common probabilistic structure used for modeling motor vehicle crashes remains the traditional Poisson and Poisson-gamma (or Negative Binomial) distribution; when crash data exhibit over-dispersion, the Poisson-gamma model is usually the model of choice most favored by transportation safety modelers. Crash data collected for safety studies often have the unusual attributes of being characterized by low sample mean values. Studies have shown that the goodness-of-fit of statistical models produced from such datasets can be significantly affected. This issue has been defined as the "low mean problem" (LMP). Despite recent developments on methods to circumvent the LMP and test the goodness-of-fit of models developed using such datasets, no work has so far examined how the LMP affects the fixed dispersion parameter of Poisson-gamma models used for modeling motor vehicle crashes. The dispersion parameter plays an important role in many types of safety studies and should, therefore, be reliably estimated. The primary objective of this research project was to verify whether the LMP affects the estimation of the dispersion parameter and, if it is, to determine the magnitude of the problem. The secondary objective consisted of determining the effects of an unreliably estimated dispersion parameter on common analyses performed in highway safety studies. To accomplish the objectives of the study, a series of Poisson-gamma distributions were simulated using different values describing the mean, the dispersion parameter, and the sample size. Three estimators commonly used by transportation safety modelers for estimating the dispersion parameter of Poisson-gamma models were evaluated: the method of moments, the weighted regression, and the maximum likelihood method. In an attempt to complement the outcome of the simulation study, Poisson-gamma models were fitted to crash data collected in Toronto, Ont. characterized by a low sample mean and small sample size. The study shows that a low sample mean combined with a small sample size can seriously affect the estimation of the dispersion parameter, no matter which estimator is used within the estimation process. The probability the dispersion parameter becomes unreliably estimated increases significantly as the sample mean and sample size decrease. Consequently, the results show that an unreliably estimated dispersion parameter can significantly undermine empirical Bayes (EB) estimates as well as the estimation of confidence intervals for the gamma mean and predicted response. The paper ends with recommendations about minimizing the likelihood of producing Poisson-gamma models with an unreliable dispersion parameter for modeling motor vehicle crashes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16545328     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  10 in total

1.  Average Effects Based on Regressions with a Logarithmic Link Function: A New Approach with Stochastic Covariates.

Authors:  Christoph Kiefer; Axel Mayer
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Meta-analysis for rare events.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Layla Parast; Louise Ryan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Discrimination, Serious Psychological Distress, and Church-Based Emotional Support Among African American Men Across the Life Span.

Authors:  Ann W Nguyen; Linda M Chatters; Robert Joseph Taylor; María P Aranda; Karen D Lincoln; Courtney S Thomas
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Effects of a behavioral intervention to reduce serodiscordant unsafe sex among HIV positive men who have sex with men: the Positive Connections randomized controlled trial study.

Authors:  B R Simon Rosser; Laura A Hatfield; Michael H Miner; Margherita E Ghiselli; Brian R Lee; Seth L Welles
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-01-26

5.  Micro-spatial distribution of malaria cases and control strategies at ward level in Gwanda district, Matabeleland South, Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Tawanda Manyangadze; Moses J Chimbari; Margaret Macherera; Samson Mukaratirwa
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Semi-parametric analysis of overdispersed count and metric data with varying follow-up times: Asymptotic theory and small sample approximations.

Authors:  Frank Konietschke; Tim Friede; Markus Pauly
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Roadway traffic crash prediction using a state-space model based support vector regression approach.

Authors:  Chunjiao Dong; Kun Xie; Xubin Sun; Miaomiao Lyu; Hao Yue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  COVID-19 Community Incidence and Associated Neighborhood-Level Characteristics in Houston, Texas, USA.

Authors:  Abiodun O Oluyomi; Sarah M Gunter; Lauren M Leining; Kristy O Murray; Chris Amos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Analytic Pearson residuals for normalization of single-cell RNA-seq UMI data.

Authors:  Jan Lause; Philipp Berens; Dmitry Kobak
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Bayesian model selection techniques as decision support for shaping a statistical analysis plan of a clinical trial: an example from a vertigo phase III study with longitudinal count data as primary endpoint.

Authors:  Christine Adrion; Ulrich Mansmann
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 4.615

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.