PURPOSE: In order to improve the survival of patients with a glioblastoma multiforme tumor (GBM), new therapeutic strategies must be developed. The use of a death inducing ligand such as TRAIL (TNF Related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand) seems a promising innovative therapy. The aim of this study was to quantify the expression of the death regulating receptors TRAIL-R1, TRAIL-R2 and TRAIL on primary GBM specimens and to correlate this expression with survival. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression of TRAIL and TRAIL-receptors was assessed by immunohistochemistry, both quantitatively (% of positive tumor cells) and semi-quantitatively (staining intensity) within both the perinecrotic and intermediate tumor zones of primary GBM specimens. RT-PCR of GBM tissue was performed to show expression of TRAIL receptor mRNA. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry showed a slight diffuse intracytoplasmic and a stronger membranous staining for TRAIL and TRAIL receptors in tumor cells. Semi-quantitative expression of TRAIL showed a significantly higher expression of TRAIL in the perinecrotic zone than in the intermediate zone of the tumor (P=0.0001). TRAIL-R2 expression was significantly higher expressed than TRAIL-R1 (P=0.005). The antigenic load of TRAIL-R2 was positively correlated with survival (P=0.02). Multivariate analysis of TRAIL-R1 within the study group (n=62) showed that age, gender, staining intensity, antigenic load, % of TRAIL-R1 expression, were not statistically correlated with survival however radiotherapy was significantly correlated (multivariate analysis: age: P=0.15; gender: P=0.64; staining intensity: P=0.17; antigenic load: P=0.056; % of TRAIL-R1 expression: P=0.058; radiotherapy: P=0.0001). Subgroup analysis of patients who had received radiotherapy (n=47) showed a significant association of % of TRAIL-R1 expression and the antigenic load of TRAIL-R1 with survival (multivariate analysis: P=0.036, respectively, P=0.023). Multivariate analysis of TRAIL-R2 staining intensity and antigenic load, within the study group (P=0.004, respectively, P=0.03) and the subgroup (P=0.002, respectively, P=0.004), showed a significant association with survival. RT-PCR analysis detected a negative relation between the amount of TRAIL-R1 mRNA and the WHO grade of astrocytic tumors (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 expression on tumor cells are independent prognostic factors for survival in patients with a glioblastoma multiforme. Both receptors could be targets for TRAIL therapy. As TRAIL-R2 is more expressed, in comparison with TRAIL-R1, on GBM tumor cells, TRAIL-R2 seems to be of more importance as a target for future TRAIL therapy than TRAIL-R1.
PURPOSE: In order to improve the survival of patients with a glioblastoma multiforme tumor (GBM), new therapeutic strategies must be developed. The use of a death inducing ligand such as TRAIL (TNF Related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand) seems a promising innovative therapy. The aim of this study was to quantify the expression of the death regulating receptors TRAIL-R1, TRAIL-R2 and TRAIL on primary GBM specimens and to correlate this expression with survival. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression of TRAIL and TRAIL-receptors was assessed by immunohistochemistry, both quantitatively (% of positive tumor cells) and semi-quantitatively (staining intensity) within both the perinecrotic and intermediate tumor zones of primary GBM specimens. RT-PCR of GBM tissue was performed to show expression of TRAIL receptor mRNA. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry showed a slight diffuse intracytoplasmic and a stronger membranous staining for TRAIL and TRAIL receptors in tumor cells. Semi-quantitative expression of TRAIL showed a significantly higher expression of TRAIL in the perinecrotic zone than in the intermediate zone of the tumor (P=0.0001). TRAIL-R2 expression was significantly higher expressed than TRAIL-R1 (P=0.005). The antigenic load of TRAIL-R2 was positively correlated with survival (P=0.02). Multivariate analysis of TRAIL-R1 within the study group (n=62) showed that age, gender, staining intensity, antigenic load, % of TRAIL-R1 expression, were not statistically correlated with survival however radiotherapy was significantly correlated (multivariate analysis: age: P=0.15; gender: P=0.64; staining intensity: P=0.17; antigenic load: P=0.056; % of TRAIL-R1 expression: P=0.058; radiotherapy: P=0.0001). Subgroup analysis of patients who had received radiotherapy (n=47) showed a significant association of % of TRAIL-R1 expression and the antigenic load of TRAIL-R1 with survival (multivariate analysis: P=0.036, respectively, P=0.023). Multivariate analysis of TRAIL-R2 staining intensity and antigenic load, within the study group (P=0.004, respectively, P=0.03) and the subgroup (P=0.002, respectively, P=0.004), showed a significant association with survival. RT-PCR analysis detected a negative relation between the amount of TRAIL-R1 mRNA and the WHO grade of astrocytic tumors (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS:TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 expression on tumor cells are independent prognostic factors for survival in patients with a glioblastoma multiforme. Both receptors could be targets for TRAIL therapy. As TRAIL-R2 is more expressed, in comparison with TRAIL-R1, on GBM tumor cells, TRAIL-R2 seems to be of more importance as a target for future TRAIL therapy than TRAIL-R1.
Authors: Jörn Sträter; Ulf Hinz; Henning Walczak; Gunhild Mechtersheimer; Karin Koretz; Christian Herfarth; Peter Möller; Thomas Lehnert Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C Gratas; Y Tohma; E G Van Meir; M Klein; M Tenan; N Ishii; O Tachibana; P Kleihues; H Ohgaki Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 6.508
Authors: M A Grotzer; A Eggert; T J Zuzak; A J Janss; S Marwaha; B R Wiewrodt; N Ikegaki; G M Brodeur; P C Phillips Journal: Oncogene Date: 2000-09-21 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Edwin Bremer; Douwe F Samplonius; Linda van Genne; Marike H Dijkstra; Bart Jan Kroesen; Lou F M H de Leij; Wijnand Helfrich Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-01-11 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Manuel Nieto-Sampedro; Beatriz Valle-Argos; Diego Gómez-Nicola; Alfonso Fernández-Mayoralas; Manuel Nieto-Díaz Journal: Clin Med Insights Oncol Date: 2011-09-21
Authors: Bartlomiej B Ordys; Séverine Launay; Ruth F Deighton; James McCulloch; Ian R Whittle Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Dolly G Aguilera; Chandra M Das; Neeta D Sinnappah-Kang; Celine Joyce; Pete H Taylor; Sijin Wen; Martin Hasselblatt; Werner Paulus; Greg Fuller; Johannes E Wolff; Vidya Gopalakrishnan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Marianela Candolfi; Kader Yagiz; David Foulad; Gabrielle E Alzadeh; Matthew Tesarfreund; A K M Ghulam Muhammad; Mariana Puntel; Kurt M Kroeger; Chunyan Liu; Sharon Lee; James F Curtin; Gwendalyn D King; Jonathan Lerner; Katsuaki Sato; Yohei Mineharu; Weidong Xiong; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Daniel G Tanenbaum; William A Hall; Lauren E Colbert; Amanda J Bastien; Daniel J Brat; Jun Kong; Sungjin Kim; Bhakti Dwivedi; Jeanne Kowalski; Jerome C Landry; David S Yu Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2016-06
Authors: J C Boer; U M Domanska; H Timmer-Bosscha; I G J Boer; C J C de Haas; J V Joseph; F A E Kruyt; E G E de Vries; W F A den Dunnen; J A G van Strijp; A M E Walenkamp Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 7.640