Literature DB >> 16543675

Activin or follistatin: which is more beneficial to support liver regeneration after massive hepatectomy?

Daisuke Endo1, Masatoshi Maku-Uchi, Itaru Kojima.   

Abstract

The present study was conducted to compare the effects of exogenous follistatin and activin A on liver regeneration in 90% hepatectomized rats. Intraportal administration of follistatin markedly accelerated liver regeneration, and nuclear BrdU labeling and liver regeneration rate were greatly increased by follistatin. In contrast, administration of activin A attenuated liver regeneration. After 120 h of 90% hepatectomy, histological analysis showed that the hepatic architecture was restored in control and activin-treated rats. However, it was not restored in follistatin-treated rats. The serum bilirubin levels were significantly increased in follistatin-treated rats, and the serum glucose level was significantly lower in follistatin-treated rats. Although follistatin markedly accelerated liver regeneration, it reduced the function of the remnant liver. Treatment with activin A instead may be beneficial to support liver regeneration after massive hepatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16543675     DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.53.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr J        ISSN: 0918-8959            Impact factor:   2.349


  11 in total

Review 1.  Signal molecule-mediated hepatic cell communication during liver regeneration.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Zheng; Shun-Yan Weng; Yan Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Stochastic control of proliferation and differentiation in stem cell dynamics.

Authors:  Zheng Sun; Natalia L Komarova
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Mathematical model of liver regeneration in human live donors.

Authors:  V Periwal; J R Gaillard; L Needleman; C Doria
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Activins and follistatins: Emerging roles in liver physiology and cancer.

Authors:  Emanuel Kreidl; Deniz Oztürk; Thomas Metzner; Walter Berger; Michael Grusch
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-31

5.  Beneficial effects of follistatin in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injuries in rats.

Authors:  Mami Kanamoto; Mitsuo Shimada; Yuji Morine; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Satoru Imura; Toru Ikegami; Hiroki Mori; Yusuke Arakawa
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Activins and activin antagonists in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alev Deli; Emanuel Kreidl; Stefan Santifaller; Barbara Trotter; Katja Seir; Walter Berger; Rolf Schulte-Hermann; Chantal Rodgarkia-Dara; Michael Grusch
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Stochastic modeling of stem-cell dynamics with control.

Authors:  Zheng Sun; Natalia L Komarova
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.144

8.  Regulation of activin receptor-interacting protein 2 expression in mouse hepatoma Hepa1-6 cells and its relationship with collagen type IV.

Authors:  Hong-Jun Zhang; Gui-Xiang Tai; Jing Zhou; Di Ma; Zhong-Hui Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Mir-34a is upregulated during liver regeneration in rats and is associated with the suppression of hepatocyte proliferation.

Authors:  Huan Chen; Yimin Sun; Ruiqi Dong; Shengsheng Yang; Chuanyong Pan; Dao Xiang; Mingyong Miao; Binghua Jiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Activin A induces growth arrest through a SMAD- dependent pathway in hepatic progenitor cells.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Wei Zhang; Hui-fang Liang; Qiao-fan Zhou; Ze-yang Ding; Hong-qiang Yang; Wei-bo Liu; Yan-hui Wu; Quan Man; Bi-xiang Zhang; Xiao-ping Chen
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 5.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.