Literature DB >> 16543024

Interactions of pigments and opacifiers on color stability of MDX4-4210/type A maxillofacial elastomers subjected to artificial aging.

Sudarat Kiat-Amnuay1, Trakol Mekayarajjananonth, John M Powers, Mark S Chambers, James C Lemon.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The color instability and degradation of maxillofacial elastomers limit the function and cosmetic quality of facial prostheses.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the interactions of oil pigments plus dry earth opacifiers at 5%, 10%, and 15% by volume in stabilizing the color of MDX4-4210/type A silicone elastomers before and after artificial aging.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the first part of the study, each of 5 opacifiers (Georgia kaolin powder neutral, kaolin powder calcined, Artskin white, dry pigment titanium (Ti) white, or Ti white artists' oil color) at 10% concentrations were combined with each of 5 oil pigment types (no pigment, cadmium-barium red deep, yellow ochre, burnt sienna, or a mixture of the 3 pigments), for a total of 25 experimental groups of elastomers. In the second part of the study, 50 experimental groups of elastomers were made by combining 1 of 5 opacifiers at 5% and 15% concentrations with 1 of 5 oil pigments as in Part 1. Five specimens of each elastomer were tested, for a total of 375 specimens. In each part of the study, all specimens were aged in an artificial aging chamber. CIE L*a*b* values were measured by a spectrophotometer. The color differences (DeltaE*) were subjected to repeated-measures analysis of variance. Mean values were compared by Tukey-Kramer intervals (alpha = .05).
RESULTS: In Part 1, when the opacifiers were tested at 10% concentration, Ti white oil color had the most color change, and dry pigment Ti white had the least; all other opacifiers were not significantly different from each other. In Part 2, at 5%, Ti white oil color had the most color change; all other opacifiers were not significantly different from the others. At 15%, Ti white oil color again had the most color change, followed by Artskin white, kaolin powder calcined, and Georgia kaolin; Ti white dry earth pigment had the least color change. Overall, 5% Artskin white had less color change than the 15%, whereas 15% dry pigment Ti white had less color change than the 5% (P < .001). The 5% and 15% of other opacifiers were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: At all 3 concentrations, oil pigments mixed with opacifiers helped protect the MDX4-4210/type A silicone elastomer from color degradation over time. Dry pigment Ti white remained the most color stable over time, followed by the pigments mixed with kaolin powder calcined, Georgia kaolin, Artskin white, and Ti white artists' oil color.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16543024     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  15 in total

1.  A Custom Made Intrinsic Silicone Shade Guide for Indian Population.

Authors:  K V Anitha; Mohammed Behanam; S C Ahila; J Brintha Jei
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

2.  Maxillofacial materials reinforced with various concentrations of polyhedral silsesquioxanes.

Authors:  Sharif A Mohammad; Alvin G Wee; Deborah J Rumsey; Scott R Schricker
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2010-07-20

3.  Influence of opacifiers on dimensional stability and detail reproduction of maxillofacial silicone elastomer.

Authors:  Marcelo C Goiato; Marcela F Haddad; Mário A C Sinhoreti; Daniela M dos Santos; Aldiéris A Pesqueira; Amália Moreno
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Chromatic stability of acrylic resins of artificial eyes submitted to accelerated aging and polishing.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Daniela Micheline dos Santos; Josiene Firmino Souza; Amália Moreno; Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Influence of nanoparticles on color stability, microhardness, and flexural strength of acrylic resins specific for ocular prosthesis.

Authors:  Agda Marobo Andreotti; Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Amália Moreno; Adhara Smith Nobrega; Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-12-10

6.  Change in color of a maxillofacial prosthetic silicone elastomer, following investment in molds of different materials.

Authors:  Tania Sethi; Mohit Kheur; Trevor Coward; Naimesha Patel
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

7.  Color stability of thermochromic pigment in maxillofacial silicone.

Authors:  Rosita Kantola; Lippo V J Lassila; Mimmi Tolvanen; Pekka K Valittu
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Evaluation of the effect of ultraviolet stabilizers on the change in color of pigmented silicone elastomer: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Mohit Kheur; Tania Sethi; Trevor Coward; Dilip Kakade; M Rajkumar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

Review 9.  The color stability of maxillofacial silicones: A systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Priya Gupta; Saee Deshpande; Usha Radke; Suresh Ughade; Rajesh Sethuraman
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun

10.  A spectrophotometric analysis of extraoral aging conditions on the color stability of maxillofacial silicone.

Authors:  Siddharth Mehta; D B Nandeeshwar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.