Literature DB >> 16542761

Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.

Sanjay Gupta1, Andrew M R New, Mark Taylor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the short-term performance of modern resurfacing hip arthroplasty is impressive, the long-term performance is still unknown. It is hypothesised that bone remodelling and the resulting changes in stress/strain distribution within the resurfaced femur influence the risk of fixation failure.
METHOD: Three-dimensional finite element models and adaptive bone remodelling algorithms have been used to predict long-term changes in bone density following cemented femoral head resurfacing. Applied loading conditions include normal walking and stair climbing. The remodelling simulation was validated by comparing the results of an analysis of a proximal femur implanted with a Charnley femoral component with known clinical data in terms of bone density adaptations.
FINDINGS: Resurfacing caused a reduction of strain of 20-70% in the bone underlying the implant as compared to the intact femur, immediately post operative. Elevated strains, ranging between 0.50 and 0.80% strain, were generated post-operatively around the proximal femoral neck regions, indicating a potential risk of neck fracture. However, this strain concentration was considerably reduced after bone remodelling. After remodelling, bone resorption of 60-90% was observed in the bone underlying the implant. Reduction in bone density of 5-47% occurred in the lateral femoral head. Bone apposition was observed in the proximal-medial cortex, around the inferior edge of the implant. Hardly any changes in bone density occurred in the distal neck or the femoral diaphysis.
INTERPRETATION: Although resurfacing has produced encouraging clinical results, bone remodelling within the femoral head might be a concern for long-term fixation. Regions of strain concentration at the head-neck junction, which may increase the initial risk of femoral neck fracture, are reduced with bone remodelling. In order to reduce this risk of femoral neck fracture, patients should avoid activities which induce high loading of the hip during the early rehabilitation period after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16542761     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  6 in total

1.  Longitudinal evaluation of time related femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Wenbao Wang; Jeffrey A Geller; Rohit Hasija; Jung Keun Choi; David A Patrick; William Macaulay
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18

2.  Bone mineral density of the femoral neck in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeannette Østergaard Penny; Ole Ovesen; Kim Brixen; Jens-Erik Varmarken; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  A biomechanical assessment of modular and monoblock revision hip implants using FE analysis and strain gage measurements.

Authors:  Habiba Bougherara; Rad Zdero; Suraj Shah; Milan Miric; Marcello Papini; Paul Zalzal; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Validation of Material Algorithms for Femur Remodelling Using Medical Image Data.

Authors:  Shitong Luo; Xingquan Shen; Xin Bai; Jing Bai; Jianning Han; Yu Shang
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 1.781

5.  Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation.

Authors:  Andrea Emilio Salvi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Numerical test concerning bone mass apposition under electrical and mechanical stimulus.

Authors:  Diego A Garzón-Alvarado; Angélica M Ramírez-Martínez; Carmen Alicia Cardozo de Martínez
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.432

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.